Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
View all articles
Authors

Re H-B (Contact) [2015] EWCA Civ 389

Sep 29, 2018, 22:33 PM
The father’s appeal from an order refusing direct contact between himself and his two children, aged 16 and 14, was dismissed.
Slug : re-h-b-contact-2015-ewca-civ-389
Meta Title : Re H-B (Contact) [2015] EWCA Civ 389
Meta Keywords : Contact – Intractable contact dispute – 16 and 14 year olds objecting to contact with father – Order for no direct contact – Appeal – Whether the judge should have instructed an expert to advise on moving contact forward
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Apr 29, 2015, 04:49 AM
Article ID : 116734
(Court of Appeal, Sir James Munby, the President of the Family Division, Black, Vos LJJ, 22 April 2015)

 Contact – Intractable contact dispute – 16 and 14 year olds objecting to contact with father – Order for no direct contact – Appeal – Whether the judge should have instructed an expert to advise on moving contact forward
 
Please see attached file below for the full judgment.


 The father’s appeal from an order refusing direct contact between himself and his two children, aged 16 and 14, was dismissed. 
  Neutral Citation Number: [2015] EWCA Civ 389
 Case No: B4/2014/2622

 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
 ON APPEAL FROM BRISTOL COUNTY COURT
 HIS HONOUR JUDGE WILDBLOOD QC PL12P01463

 Royal Courts of Justice
 Strand
 London
 WC2A 2LL

 Date: 22/04/2015

 
 
Before :

 PRESIDENT OF THE FAMILY DIVISION
 LADY JUSTICE BLACK
 and
 LORD JUSTICE VOS

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

 RE H-B (CONTACT)

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

 Ms Sarah Evans ( Pro Bono) for the Appellant
 Ms Ceri White (Direct Access) for the 1st Respondent
 Ms Kathryn Skellorn QC & Ms Jessica Wood (instructed by Pardoes Solicitors LLP) for the 2nd Respondent
 Ms Abigail Bond (instructed by Wollen Michelmore ) for the 3rd Respondent

 Hearing date: 31st March 2015

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
 
 

 Judgment

 Re H-B (Contact) [2015] EWCA Civ 389 
Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Private Law Children
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from