Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
View all articles
Authors

Re H-B (Contact) [2015] EWCA Civ 389

Sep 29, 2018, 22:33 PM
The father’s appeal from an order refusing direct contact between himself and his two children, aged 16 and 14, was dismissed.
Slug : re-h-b-contact-2015-ewca-civ-389
Meta Title : Re H-B (Contact) [2015] EWCA Civ 389
Meta Keywords : Contact – Intractable contact dispute – 16 and 14 year olds objecting to contact with father – Order for no direct contact – Appeal – Whether the judge should have instructed an expert to advise on moving contact forward
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Apr 29, 2015, 04:49 AM
Article ID : 116734
(Court of Appeal, Sir James Munby, the President of the Family Division, Black, Vos LJJ, 22 April 2015)

 Contact – Intractable contact dispute – 16 and 14 year olds objecting to contact with father – Order for no direct contact – Appeal – Whether the judge should have instructed an expert to advise on moving contact forward
 
Please see attached file below for the full judgment.


 The father’s appeal from an order refusing direct contact between himself and his two children, aged 16 and 14, was dismissed. 
  Neutral Citation Number: [2015] EWCA Civ 389
 Case No: B4/2014/2622

 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
 ON APPEAL FROM BRISTOL COUNTY COURT
 HIS HONOUR JUDGE WILDBLOOD QC PL12P01463

 Royal Courts of Justice
 Strand
 London
 WC2A 2LL

 Date: 22/04/2015

 
 
Before :

 PRESIDENT OF THE FAMILY DIVISION
 LADY JUSTICE BLACK
 and
 LORD JUSTICE VOS

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

 RE H-B (CONTACT)

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

 Ms Sarah Evans ( Pro Bono) for the Appellant
 Ms Ceri White (Direct Access) for the 1st Respondent
 Ms Kathryn Skellorn QC & Ms Jessica Wood (instructed by Pardoes Solicitors LLP) for the 2nd Respondent
 Ms Abigail Bond (instructed by Wollen Michelmore ) for the 3rd Respondent

 Hearing date: 31st March 2015

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
 
 

 Judgment

 Re H-B (Contact) [2015] EWCA Civ 389 
Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Private Law Children
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from