Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
Unequal chances? Ethnic disproportionality in child welfare and family justice
Many have experienced their own Black Lives Matter moment in the last 12 months, a sharp realisation of entrenched prejudices and inequalities that still exist in our society.In the family justice...
Changes to the law on Domestic Abuse
Official statistics (ONS (2016), March 2015 Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW)) show that around 2 million people suffer from some form of domestic abuse each year in the UK. In...
Managing costs in complex children cases
In November 2020 Spice Girl Mel B was in the news, despairing about how the legal costs of trying to relocate her daughter Madison from the US to England were likely to bankrupt her, leading to her...
View all articles
Authors

Re H-B (Contact) [2015] EWCA Civ 389

Sep 29, 2018, 22:33 PM
The father’s appeal from an order refusing direct contact between himself and his two children, aged 16 and 14, was dismissed.
Slug : re-h-b-contact-2015-ewca-civ-389
Meta Title : Re H-B (Contact) [2015] EWCA Civ 389
Meta Keywords : Contact – Intractable contact dispute – 16 and 14 year olds objecting to contact with father – Order for no direct contact – Appeal – Whether the judge should have instructed an expert to advise on moving contact forward
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Apr 29, 2015, 04:49 AM
Article ID : 116734
(Court of Appeal, Sir James Munby, the President of the Family Division, Black, Vos LJJ, 22 April 2015)

 Contact – Intractable contact dispute – 16 and 14 year olds objecting to contact with father – Order for no direct contact – Appeal – Whether the judge should have instructed an expert to advise on moving contact forward
 
Please see attached file below for the full judgment.


 The father’s appeal from an order refusing direct contact between himself and his two children, aged 16 and 14, was dismissed. 
  Neutral Citation Number: [2015] EWCA Civ 389
 Case No: B4/2014/2622

 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
 ON APPEAL FROM BRISTOL COUNTY COURT
 HIS HONOUR JUDGE WILDBLOOD QC PL12P01463

 Royal Courts of Justice
 Strand
 London
 WC2A 2LL

 Date: 22/04/2015

 
 
Before :

 PRESIDENT OF THE FAMILY DIVISION
 LADY JUSTICE BLACK
 and
 LORD JUSTICE VOS

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

 RE H-B (CONTACT)

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

 Ms Sarah Evans ( Pro Bono) for the Appellant
 Ms Ceri White (Direct Access) for the 1st Respondent
 Ms Kathryn Skellorn QC & Ms Jessica Wood (instructed by Pardoes Solicitors LLP) for the 2nd Respondent
 Ms Abigail Bond (instructed by Wollen Michelmore ) for the 3rd Respondent

 Hearing date: 31st March 2015

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
 
 

 Judgment

 Re H-B (Contact) [2015] EWCA Civ 389 
Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Private Law Children
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from