Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
The need for proportionality and the ‘Covid impact’
Simon Wilkinson, Parklane PlowdenThe Covid-19 pandemic has infiltrated every aspect of our lives. Within the courts and tribunals service there has been a plethora of guidance since March 2020 which...
Local authority input into private law proceedings, part II
Mani Singh Basi, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingsLucy Logan Green, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingThis article considers the interplay between private and public law proceedings, focusing on the law relating...
Time for change (II)
Lisa Parkinson, Family mediation trainer, co-founder and a Vice-President of the Family Mediators AssociationThe family law community needs to respond to the urgent call for change from the...
How Can I Wed Thee? – Let Me Change the Ways: the Law Commission’s Consultation Paper on ‘Weddings’ Law (2020)
Professor Chris Barton, A Vice-President of the Family Mediators Association, Academic Door Tenant, Regent Chambers, Stoke-on-TrentThis article considers the Paper's 91 Consultation Questions...
Consultation on the proposed transfer of the assessment of all civil legal aid bills of costs to the Legal Aid Agency
The Ministry of Justice has launched a consultation on the proposed transfer from Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service to the Legal Aid Agency of the assessment of all civil legal aid bills of...
View all articles
Authors

ABDUCTION: Re H (Abduction: Non-Convention Application) [2006] EWHC 199 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:26 PM
Slug : re-h-abduction-non-convention-application-2006-ewhc-199-fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Feb 6, 2006, 09:37 AM
Article ID : 86389

(Family Division; Bracewell J; 6 February 2006)

The Dominican court had awarded custody of the children to the father. The children were later removed from Dominica, the country of habitual residence, by the mother and brought to England. The father sought the summary return of the children, although not under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction 1980 as Dominica was not a signatory. The children reported significant use of corporal punishment at the father's hands and his approval of corporal punishment by others, including teachers. The details were not disputed by the father.

Corporal punishment was lawful in Dominica and, according to the Human Rights Treaty body, widely used. It was plainly acceptable within Dominica to treat a child with physical violence. The children could not be protected by the Dominican courts if returned. The welfare considerations fell firmly down against returning the children and the father's application was dismissed.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from