Latest articles
UK Immigration Rough Sleeper Rule
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsThe UK government has recently introduced a controversial new set of rules that aim to make rough sleeping grounds for refusal or cancellation of a migrant’s...
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
View all articles
Authors

ABDUCTION: Re H (Abduction: Non-Convention Application) [2006] EWHC 199 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:26 PM
Slug : re-h-abduction-non-convention-application-2006-ewhc-199-fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Feb 6, 2006, 09:37 AM
Article ID : 86389

(Family Division; Bracewell J; 6 February 2006)

The Dominican court had awarded custody of the children to the father. The children were later removed from Dominica, the country of habitual residence, by the mother and brought to England. The father sought the summary return of the children, although not under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction 1980 as Dominica was not a signatory. The children reported significant use of corporal punishment at the father's hands and his approval of corporal punishment by others, including teachers. The details were not disputed by the father.

Corporal punishment was lawful in Dominica and, according to the Human Rights Treaty body, widely used. It was plainly acceptable within Dominica to treat a child with physical violence. The children could not be protected by the Dominican courts if returned. The welfare considerations fell firmly down against returning the children and the father's application was dismissed.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from