Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
No fault divorce - the end of the blame game
The Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020, which passed into law on 25 June 2020, will introduce "no fault" divorce in England and Wales for the first time. This article looks at what it...
New Cafcass guidance on working with children during COVID-19
The Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass) has published guidance on working with children during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The guidance sets out arrangements for...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
Online event: An update on recovery in the civil, family courts & tribunals
HM Courts and Tribunals Service has announced that it is holding an online event to discuss its recovery plan for the civil, family courts and tribunals, which was published on 9 November 2020...
HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirms 2020 Christmas and new year closure dates
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has confirmed the dates over the Christmas and new year period in which Crown Courts, magistrates’ courts,...
View all articles
Authors

Re H (Parental Alienation) PA v TT and another [2019] EWHC 2723 (Fam)

Oct 23, 2019, 14:41 PM
Private law children – Parental alienation – Child arrangement order – Best interests.
The Family Division held that it was in the best interests of the child to transfer his residence from his mother’s to his father’s care.
Slug :
Meta Title : Re H (Parental Alienation) PA v TT and another [2019] EWHC 2723 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Private law children – Parental alienation – Child arrangement order – Best interests.
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Oct 22, 2019, 23:00 PM
Article ID :

(Family Division, Keehan J, 3 October 2019)

Private law children – Parental alienation – Child arrangement order – Best interests

The Family Division held that it was in the best interests of the child to transfer his residence from his mother’s to his father’s care.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.


Neutral Citation Number: [2019] EWHC 2723 (Fam)

Case No: LE16P01408

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 03/10/2019

Before :

MR JUSTICE KEEHAN

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Re H (Parental Alienation)

Between :

PA
Applicant

- and -

TT
1st Respondent

-and-

H
(A Child by way of 16.4 Children’s Guardian)
2nd Respondent

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Mr R Jones (instructed by Helen Fitzsimmons Family Law) for the Applicant
The 1st Respondent appeared in person
Ms A Musgrave (instructed by NYAS) for the 2nd Respondent

Hearing dates: 20th - 22nd August and 20th September

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Approved Judgment

I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic.

.............................

MR JUSTICE KEEHAN

This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.

 

Judgment: Re H (Parental Alienation) PA v TT [2019] EWHC 2723 (Fam)

Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Private Law Children
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from