Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
The suspension, during lockdown, of prison visits for children: was it lawful?
Jake Richards, 9 Gough ChambersThis article argues that the suspension on prison visits during this period and the deficiency of measures to mitigate the impact of this on family life and to protect...
Re R (Children) (Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), King, Peter Jackson, Elisabeth Laing LJJ, 12 February 2021)Practice and Procedure – Disclosure of court documents – Sexual abuse findings –...
AG v VD [2021] EWFC 9
(Family Court, Cohen J, 04 February 2021) Financial Remedies – Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, Part III – Russian divorceThe wife was awarded just under £6m...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
SCTS releases new simplified divorce and dissolution forms for Scotland
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) has released new simplified divorce and dissolution forms of application. As a result of legislation repealing Council Regulation EC 2201/2003, the...
View all articles
Authors

CONTACT: Re G (Contact) [2006] EWCA Civ 1507

Sep 29, 2018, 17:38 PM
Slug : re-g-contact-2006-ewca-civ-1507
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Nov 28, 2008, 04:23 AM
Article ID : 88961

(Court of Appeal; Ward and Richards LJJ, 5 October 2006)

An order made by an Australian court that the child should be educated at a specific school (at which the father had obtained a job) and for a particular pattern of contact had been rendered impractical by the mother's move to a different part of the country. It was not permissible, on the authorities, to make an order imposing a condition on the mother's residence order that she reside within the vicinity of the school. A further change since the Australian order was the child's increasing hostility towards contact with the father. The English court, which had confirmed the terms of the Australian order, had been wrong not to take account of the geographical issues, and the problems that had already arisen in relation to contact. The provision as to schooling was discharged, and the contact element was suspended pending further investigation of the situation in the High Court.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from