Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

Re G (Children: Fair Hearing) [2019] EWCA Civ 126

Feb 13, 2019, 10:57 AM
Practice and procedure – Consent to ICO – Appeal – Whether the judge had unduly pressured the mother in consenting to the ICO
The mother’s appeal from the interim care order was allowed and it was found that the mother had been unduly pressured by the judge into consenting or not opposing the order.
Slug :
Meta Title : Re G (Children: Fair Hearing) [2019] EWCA Civ 126
Meta Keywords : Practice and procedure – Consent to ICO – Appeal – Whether the judge had unduly pressured the mother in consenting to the ICO
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Feb 13, 2019, 00:00 AM
Article ID :

(Court of Appeal, Peter Jackson LJ, Moore J, 7 February 2019)

Practice and procedure – Consent to ICO – Appeal – Whether the judge had unduly pressured the mother in consenting to the ICO

The mother’s appeal from the interim care order was allowed and it was found that the mother had been unduly pressured by the judge into consenting or not opposing the order.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.


Neutral Citation Number: [2019] EWCA Civ 126

Case No: B4/2019/0217

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM THE FAMILY COURT AT SHEFFIELD
Her Honour Judge Carr QC

SE19C000145

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 7 February 2019

 

Before :

LORD JUSTICE PETER JACKSON
and

MR JUSTICE MOOR

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between :

G (Children: Fair Hearing)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Helen Compton (instructed by Sills & Betteridge LLP) for the Appellant Mother
Caroline Ford (instructed by Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council) for the Respondent Local Authority
Ruth Richards (instructed by Malcolm C Foy & Co) for the Respondent Father (written submissions only)

Sarah Peart (Howells LLP) for the Respondent Children (written submissions only)

Hearing date: 7 February 2019

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Approved Judgment

 

Judgment: Re G (Children Fair Hearing) [2019] EWCA Civ 126

 

 

Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Practice and Procedure
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family Law (General)
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from