.jpg?sfvrsn=e5a4f948_1)
![Re R (Children) (Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162](https://www.familylaw.co.uk/images/article_provider/flr_cover.tmb-desktoplat.jpg?sfvrsn=66b9ac90_3)
26 FEB 2021
26 FEB 2021
26 FEB 2021
26 FEB 2021
26 FEB 2021
![Re R (Children) (Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162](https://www.familylaw.co.uk/images/article_provider/flr_cover.tmb-moblatest.jpg?sfvrsn=66b9ac90_3)
(Court of Appeal, Peter Jackson LJ, Moore J, 7 February 2019)
Practice and procedure – Consent to ICO – Appeal – Whether the judge had unduly pressured the mother in consenting to the ICO
The mother’s appeal from the interim care order was allowed and it was found that the mother had been unduly pressured by the judge into consenting or not opposing the order.
For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.
Subscribers can log in here.
Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.
Neutral Citation Number: [2019] EWCA Civ 126
Case No: B4/2019/0217
SE19C000145
Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL
Before :
MR JUSTICE MOOR
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
G (Children: Fair Hearing)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sarah Peart (Howells LLP) for the Respondent Children (written submissions only)
Hearing date: 7 February 2019
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Approved Judgment
Leave a commentOrder by
Newest on top Oldest on top