Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Resolution issues Brexit notes for family lawyers ahead of IP completion day
Family lawyer organisation, Resolution, has issued two joint notes to assist family lawyers in England and Wales ahead of the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period at 11 pm on 31 December...
Online filing is real-time on New Year's Eve: practice direction change to accommodate EU withdrawal arrangements
I have heard that there will be an amendment to the relevant practice directions to provide that online applications received on New Year’s Eve after 4:30 PM and before 11:00 PM will count as...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
View all articles
Authors

Re G (Children) [2019] EWCA Civ 1779

Oct 30, 2019, 15:54 PM
Public law children – Care order – Mother making application to discharge care orders – Circuit judge claiming not authorised to make injunctions under Human Rights Act 1988 and allowed mother’s application
The Court of Appeal allowed the mother’s appeal. The court held that an injunction under the Human Rights Act 1998 to prevent the removal of children placed with parents under a care order could be made by any judge.
Slug :
Meta Title : Re G (Children) [2019] EWCA Civ 1779
Meta Keywords : Public law children – Care order – Mother making application to discharge care orders – Circuit judge claiming not authorised to make injunctions under Human Rights Act 1988 and allowed mother’s application
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Oct 30, 2019, 00:00 AM
Article ID :

(Court of Appeal, Simon, David Richards and Baker LJJ, 9 October 2019)

Public law children – Care order – Mother making application to discharge care orders – Circuit judge claiming not authorised to make injunctions under Human Rights Act 1988 and allowed mother’s application.

The Court of Appeal allowed the mother’s appeal. The court held that an injunction under the Human Rights Act 1998 to prevent the removal of children placed with parents under a care order could be made by any judge. 


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.


NC NUMBER: [2019] EWCA Civ 1779

Case No: B4/2019/1903

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM

(HER HONOUR JUDGE CRONIN)

The Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL
Wednesday, 9 October 2019

Before:

LORD JUSTICE SIMON
LORD JUSTICE DAVID RICHARDS
LORD JUSTICE BAKER

 

IN THE MATTER OF G (CHILDREN)


Transcript of Epiq Europe Ltd, Lower Ground, 18-22 Furnival Street, London EC4A 1JS

Tel No: 020 7404 1400 Email: civil@epiqglobal.co.uk (Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)

This transcript is Crown Copyright. It may not be reproduced in whole or in part other than in accordance with relevant licence or with the express consent of the Authority. All rights are reserved.

This judgment was delivered in public but it is ordered that in any published version of the judgment no person other than the advocates or the solicitors instructing them and other persons named in this version of the judgment shall be  identified by name or location and that in particular the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved.

 

 

Miss Lorna Meyer QC (instructed by the Local Authority Legal Services) appeared on behalf of the Appellant Local Authority

Mr Hugh Merry (instructed by Wansbroughs) appeared on behalf of the Respondent Mother

 

Judgment
(Approved)
Crown Copyright©

 

Judgment: Re G (Children) [2019] EWCA Civ 1779

 

Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Public Law Children
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from