Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
View all articles
Authors

FAMILY PROCEEDINGS: Re F (Contact: Lack of Reasons) [2006] EWCA Civ 792

Sep 29, 2018, 17:05 PM
Slug : re-f-contact-lack-of-reasons-2006-ewca-civ-792
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : May 18, 2006, 12:02 PM
Article ID : 85755

(Court of Appeal; Thorpe and Moses LJJ and Hedley J; 18 May 2006)

The father applied for contact to the two children of his third marriage. There was an allegation that the father had sexually abused the elder of the two children. There were also allegations that he had abused a daughter by a previous marriage, and two of her friends. The judge, having heard evidence, ordered contact between the two children and the father.

The judgment was so lacking in reasoning and substance that it presented an appearance of not engaging fully with these important issues and was wholly deficient in explanations as to how or why the conclusions had been arrived at. In particular the judge had failed to explain why evidence from the two friends had been disbelieved and had not dealt in any way with the question whether there were inconsistencies in their evidence.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from