Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles

ABDUCTION: Re F (Abduction: Unborn Child) [2006] EWHC 2199 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:19 PM
Slug : re-f-abduction-unborn-child-2006-ewhc-2199-fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Aug 25, 2006, 04:23 AM
Article ID : 89193

(Family Division; Hedley J; 25 August 2006)

The mother left Wales during her pregnancy, travelling to Israel with the father's consent, but remaining in Israel after the birth. The father sought summary return of the child under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction 1980. The father's proceedings in England and Wales had been stayed, but the father nonetheless sought the assistance of the court, in the form of a declaration concerning the habitual residence of the mother and child at the time of the birth.

The judge refused to lift the stay on proceedings and refused to grant the declaration sought. While habitual residence might, exceptionally, be possible notwithstanding physical absence, the usual approach on the facts was to look for some physical presence, and this child had never been physically present in the jurisdiction. In any event, the issue of habitual residence was a matter for the courts of the requested state, in this instance Israel, therefore the English court should not rule on the subject.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from