Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
The suspension, during lockdown, of prison visits for children: was it lawful?
Jake Richards, 9 Gough ChambersThis article argues that the suspension on prison visits during this period and the deficiency of measures to mitigate the impact of this on family life and to protect...
View all articles
Authors

Re E-R (Child Arrangements)(No 2) [2017] EWHC 2382 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 21:45 PM
Private law children – Child arrangements – Transfer of care – Whether the child arrangements order should be varied
The father’s application for a transfer of care of the child was refused and a child arrangements order was made specifying that the child would spend the minimum amount of time with the father.
Slug : re-e-r-child-arrangements-no-2-2017-ewhc-2382-fam
Meta Title : Re E-R (Child Arrangements)(No 2) [2017] EWHC 2382 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Private law children – Child arrangements – Transfer of care – Whether the child arrangements order should be varied
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Oct 25, 2017, 05:20 AM
Article ID : 116087

(Family Division, Cobb J, 11 September 2017)

Private law children – Child arrangements – Transfer of care – Whether the child arrangements order should be varied

The father’s application for a transfer of care of the child was refused and a child arrangements order was made specifying that the child would spend the minimum amount of time with the father.



For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482. 

This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.

Case No: FD16P00555
Neutral Citation Number: [2017] EWHC 2382 (Fam)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL




Date: 11/09/2017

Before:


THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE COBB


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Re E-R (Child Arrangements)(No.2)


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Clare Renton (instructed by Everys) for the Applicant, Mrs H
The father and Miss B (his partner) in person on 31/8 and 1/9,
assisted by Mr. Shahriar Mazandi as their McKenzie Friend.
(The father did not attend for judgment on 11/9)
Mary Hughes (instructed by Walters & Barbury) for the child (T)


Hearing dates: 31 August & 1 September 2017


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Judgment


Judgment: Re E-R (Child Arrangements) (No 2) [2017] EWHC 2382 (Fam).rtf
Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Private Law Children
Tags :
FLR_cover
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from