Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Help separated parents ditch avoidance strategies that stop them resolving differences
The desire to avoid conflict with an ex is the primary reason that separated parents do not get to see their children.  That’s an eye-opening finding from a survey of 1,105 separated...
What is a Cohabitation Agreement, and do I need one?
Many couples, despite living together, never seek to legally formalise their living and financial arrangements.  They mistakenly believe that the concept of a ‘common law’ husband and...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 22 February 2021)Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19...
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
View all articles
Authors

PARENTAL RESPONSIBILITY: Re D (Contact and PR: Lesbian mothers and known father) (No 2) [2006] EWHC 2 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:05 PM
Slug : re-d-contact-and-pr-lesbian-mothers-and-known-father-no-2-2006-ewhc-2-fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 12, 2006, 04:22 AM
Article ID : 85665

(Family Division; Black J; 12 January 2006)

A lesbian couple who wished to have a child together, identified a man willing to conceive a child with one of the two women, on the basis that the child would live with the lesbian couple, but retain an ongoing relationship with the father. The adults disagreed from an early stage as to the extent of that relationship. A judge eventually granted contact to the father, with a residence order to the couple to protect the family relationship of the non-biological mother. Some years later, the father sought an extension of the contact, plus parental responsibility. A variation of contact was agreed to, in broad terms, in the course of the hearing, but the lesbian couple were very concerned that a grant of parental responsibility would damage their integrity as a family unit. The father offered certain undertakings to limit the practical impact of any parental responsibility order. At the judge's instigation, expert evidence was obtained on the likely impact of such an order on this unusual family situation.

The judge cited the expert evidence at length, noting that it may be of interest and assistance in other cases of this kind in the future and may obviate the need to make repeated calls on experts for guidance in similar situations". The parental responsibility order was granted, but the recital of certain conditions was included to protect the integrity of the lesbian couple as a family unit.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from