Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles

ADOPTION/IMMIGRATION: Re D (Abduction: Habitual Residence) [2005] EWHC 518 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:34 PM
Slug : re-d-abduction-habitual-residence-2005-ewhc-518-fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Feb 4, 2005, 11:02 AM
Article ID : 88447

(4 February 2005; Bracewell J; Family Division) [2005] 2 FLR 403

The part Italian mother established a home in Rome shortly after the American father's conviction for fraud, following which he was not permitted to leave the US. The mother returned to spend time in the US on many occasions, and became pregnant there, but returned to Rome to have the child. Shortly afterwards the mother and child spent some months with the father, but then went back to Rome. Abduction proceedings brought by the father in Italy were dismissed by reason of an issue as to paternity. The mother again spent some months with the child in the US, leaving for Italy shortly after the father applied for custody of the child. The father used a private detective to entrap the mother into coming to England, where fresh abduction proceedings were brought. The court was satisfied that the child had been habitually resident in Italy because of: (i) the father's lack of credibility; (ii) the mother's retention of an apartment in Rome throughout and the transfer of the mother's goods and property to the flat; (iii) the child's enrolment in an Italian pre-school day care; (iv) the purchase of return tickets for the trips to the US; (v) contemporaneous correspondence showing that the mother regarded such trips as mere visits; (vi) valid residence documentation in Italy for mother and child; (vii) the father's own statement in his custody application that the mother 'does not have strong ties with California'.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from