Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
New guidance on measures to support domestic abuse victims at court
Special measures have long been available to help victims of domestic abuse attending court.  However, the move towards remote and hybrid hearings as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic has posed...
CB v EB [2020] EWFC 72
(Family Court, Mostyn J, 16 November 2020)Financial Remedies – Consent order – Application for set aside – Property values left husband with lower sums than anticipated – FPR...
No right (as yet) to be married legally in a humanist ceremony: R (on the application of Harrison and others) v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] EWHC 2096 (Admin)
Mary Welstead, CAP Fellow, Harvard Law School, Visiting Professor in Family Law, University of BuckinghamIn July 2020, six humanist couples brought an application for judicial review on the...
Controlling and coercive behaviour is gender and colour blind but how are courts meeting the challenge to protect victims
Maryam Syed, 7BRExamining the most recent caselaw in both family and criminal law jurisdictions this article discusses the prominent and still newly emerging issue of controlling and coercive domestic...
Roma families face disadvantage in child protection proceedings
Mary Marvel, Law for LifeWe have all become familiar with the discussion about structural racism in the UK, thanks to the excellent work of the Black Lives Matter movement. But it is less recognised...
View all articles

CARE PROCEEDINGS: Re C (Family Placement) [2009] EWCA Civ 72

Sep 29, 2018, 17:27 PM
Slug : re-c-family-placement-2009-ewca-civ-72
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Feb 25, 2009, 04:22 AM
Article ID : 86591

(Court of Appeal; Jacob and Wilson LJJ; 2 January 2009)

Both parents were drug users, and were unable to care for either the 5-year-old child or the 13-year-old half-sibling. The local authority care plan was for the half-sibling to remain on a long-term basis with the foster carers currently caring for both children, and for the child to be adopted. The local authority had dismissed the 70-year-old paternal grandmother as a carer for the child, because of her age. The paternal grandmother had obtained party status in the care proceedings, and sought a residence order, supported by all the other family members, including the mother and the half-sibling. The judge criticised the authority's failure to assess the grandmother's candidacy properly, even after her acquisition of party status, and made a residence order in the grandmother's favour. The judge considered age as a factor, but concluded that family would 'rally round' if and when the grandmother's circumstances disabled her from continuing to act as the child's primary carer. The guardian appealed, supported by the local authority, on the basis that the judge's conclusion had plainly been wrong.

While it was no doubt very unusual to commit a 5-year-old to the care of a 70-year-old grandmother, there were three important factors in the case: (i) the grandmother was a member of the child's wider family, and the law's bias in favour of family members was therefore engaged; (ii) most importantly the grandmother had a substantial track record of commitment to the child, through contact in very difficult circumstances, and had established a very positive relationship with him; (iii) the grandmother was sincerely committed to maintaining contact between the child and the child's half-sibling. The local authority's adoption proposal, on the other hand, involved gross curtailment, if not effective elimination of two key relationships: the relationship with the grandmother and with the half-sibling. Three of the grandmother's adult children, and one of her adult grandchildren, had indicated not only their full support for the grandmother's candidacy as a carer, but also their willingness to act in principle as a backstop in the event that a time came when she could no longer look after the child.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from