Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Family Law Awards adds a Wellbeing Award - enter now
This past year has been different for everyone, but family law professionals working on the front line of family justice have faced a more challenging, stressful and demanding time than most. To...
Perspectives on civil partnerships and marriages in England and Wales: aspects, attitudes and assessments
IntroductionThis article considers the developments since the turn of the century in the provision of new options for same sex and opposite sex couples to formalise their unions with full legal...
Family Law journal - take the survey and you could win £50 worth of vouchers
Do you subscribe to Family Law journal?Our aim is to provide all subscribers of Family Law with compelling, insightful and helpful content that you enjoy reading and find useful in your...
Commencement date of 6 April 2022 announced for the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020
The Ministry of Justice has announced that the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020 (DDSA 2020), which received Royal Assent on 25 June 2020, will now have a commencement date of 6 April 2022....
HMCTS blog highlights the use of video hearing due to COVID-19
HM Courts & Tribunals Service has published a blog detailing the impacts of coronavirus (COVID-19) on hearings. Pre-pandemic, HMCTS states that the use of video technology for live participation...
View all articles
Authors

Re C (A Child) [2016] EWHC 3473 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 19:46 PM
Public law children – Deprivation of liberty – 15-year-old detained in secure residential unit – Whether authorisation of the High Court was necessary – Gillick competence and consent
The 15-year-old boy was found to be Gillick competent and to consent to his detainment at the secure residential unit.
Slug : re-c-a-child-2016-ewhc-3473-fam
Meta Title : Re C (A Child) [2016] EWHC 3473 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Public law children – Deprivation of liberty – 15-year-old detained in secure residential unit – Whether authorisation of the High Court was necessary – Gillick competence and consent
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 16, 2017, 11:13 AM
Article ID : 113950

(Family Division, Keehan J, 8 March 2017)

Public law children – Deprivation of liberty – 15-year-old detained in secure residential unit – Whether authorisation of the High Court was necessary – Gillick competence and consent

The 15-year-old boy was found to be Gillick competent and to consent to his detainment at the secure residential unit.

The 15-year-old boy had lived in local authority care since 2007. Due to his increasingly difficult behaviours he moved to a specialist residential unit with high levels of supervision. The restrictions imposed included him never being left alone or alone with other residents, the external doors were locked at night, bedroom doors were alarmed at night and he could not leave the unit unsupervised.

The local authority sought leave under s 100(3) of the Children Act 1989 to make an application under the inherent jurisdiction for the authorisation of the young man’s detention at the residential unit. The children’s guardian asserted that there was no need to exercise the inherent jurisdiction since he was Gillick competent and had consented to confinement.

There was no issue between the local authority and the Official Solicitor that whatever legal framework used to authorise the young man’s detainment, it was proportionate and in his best interests.

It was clear from the restrictions imposed on the young man that he was being deprived of his liberty. On the totality of the evidence he was also Gillick competent and was capable in law of consenting to his detainment. The court was satisfied that he had consented to his confinement. There was no need to exercise the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court.


Case No: LE16C00359

Neutral Citation Number: [2016] EWHC 3473 (Fam)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 08/03/2017

Before:

MR JUSTICE KEEHAN

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between:

A Local Authority
Applicant

-and –

D (1)
(By her litigation friend, the Official Solicitor)

E (2)

C (A Child) (3)
By his Children’s Guardian
Respondents

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Mr Martin Kingerley (instructed by Legal Services) for the Local Authority
Ms Victoria Butler-Cole (instructed by RP Robinson) for the Official Solicitor
Mr Malcolm Chisholm (instructed by Hunt & Coombs) for the Children’s Guardian

Hearing dates: 17th November 2016

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Judgment

Re C (A Child) [2016] EWHC 3473 (Fam).rtf
Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Public Law Children
Tags :
FLR_cover
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from