Family Law

News
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
26 NOV 2020
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
26 NOV 2020
HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirms 2020 Christmas and new year closure...
26 NOV 2020
New Cafcass guidance on working with children during COVID-19
26 NOV 2020
Online event: An update on recovery in the civil, family courts & tribunals...
20 NOV 2020
Book your free place at the Family Law Awards 2020 now!
17 NOV 2020
View all news
Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
View similar products
Family Court Practice, The
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2020 edition due out in May
View similar products
Available in LexisNexis@Library
Court of Protection Practice 2020
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
View similar products
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
View similar products
Available in LexisNexis@Library
Spotlight
Latest articles
Practical aspects to assessing competence in children
Practical aspects to assessing competence in children
Rebecca Stevens, Partner, Royds Withy KingThis is an article regarding the practical aspects to assessing competence in children. The article explores a range of practicalities, such as meeting a...
Article 29 NOV 2020
Scrumping the crop of recent pension decisions
Scrumping the crop of recent pension decisions
Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Article 30 NOV 2020
Conduct in financial remedies – when is it now a relevant consideration?
Conduct in financial remedies – when is it now a relevant consideration?
Rachel Gillman, 1 GC/Family LawThis article provides an overview of all aspects of financial misconduct following the recent decision of Mostyn J in OG v AG [2020] EWFC 52, wherein all aspects of...
Article 30 NOV 2020
The treatment of RSUs/Stock Options in light of XW v XH
The treatment of RSUs/Stock Options in light of XW v XH
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
Article 30 NOV 2020
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
Alexander Sverdlov
Article 27 NOV 2020
View all articles
Latest articles
View all articles
Authors
Author
Alexander Sverdlov
Author
David Hodson OBE MCIArb
Author
Dianne Millen
Author
Sarah Williams
Author
Megan Bennie
Author
Alexandra Bishop
View all authors

Re B-P (Children : Adoption Or Fostering) [2018] EWCA Civ 2042

Dec 3, 2018, 17:08 PM
Public law children – Adoption – Fostering – Three young children in foster care – Refusal to grant a placement for adoption order – Appeal – Whether the benefits of adoption had been considered
The local authority appeal from a decision that the three young children should remain in foster care rather than be adopted was allowed and the case remitted for reconsideration.
Slug : re-b-p-children-adoption-or-fostering-2018-ewca-civ-2042
Meta Title : Re B-P (Children : Adoption Or Fostering) [2018] EWCA Civ 2042
Meta Keywords : Public law children – Adoption – Fostering – Three young children in foster care – Refusal to grant a placement for adoption order – Appeal – Whether the benefits of adoption had been considered
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Sep 26, 2018, 07:30 AM
Article ID : 117390

(Court of Appeal, Underhill VP, Floyd, Peter Jackson LJJ, 20 September 2018)

Public law children – Adoption – Fostering – Three young children in foster care – Refusal to grant a placement for adoption order – Appeal – Whether the benefits of adoption had been considered

The local authority appeal from a decision that the three young children should remain in foster care rather than be adopted was allowed and the case remitted for reconsideration.

For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482. 
Neutral Citation Number: [2018] EWCA Civ 2042
Case No: B4/2018/1788
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM STOKE-ON-TRENT COMBINED COURT
Recorder Clark
SQ17C00285
Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 20 September 2018
Before :

LORD JUSTICE UNDERHILL
Vice-President of the Court of Appeal (Civil Division)

LORD JUSTICE FLOYD
and
LORD JUSTICE PETER JACKSON

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between :

Re: B-P (Children) [Adoption or Fostering]

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Nicholas Goodwin QC and Christopher Adams (instructed by Staffordshire County Council) for the Appellant local authority
Clare Dillon (instructed by David Foster & Co. Solicitors) for the Mother
Michael Jones (instructed by Moseleys Solicitors) for the Father
Nina Bache (instructed by McGuinness Legal) for the Children

Hearing date: 6 September 2018

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Judgment Approved

Judgment: Re B-P (Children Adoption or Fostering) [2018] EWCA Civ 2042.rtf

Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Public Law Children
Tags :
FLR_cover
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles

Leave a comment

Order by

Newest on top Oldest on top
Load more comments
Comment by from
Copyright © 2020 LexisNexis