Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
New Cafcass guidance on working with children during COVID-19
The Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass) has published guidance on working with children during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The guidance sets out arrangements for...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
Online event: An update on recovery in the civil, family courts & tribunals
HM Courts and Tribunals Service has announced that it is holding an online event to discuss its recovery plan for the civil, family courts and tribunals, which was published on 9 November 2020...
HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirms 2020 Christmas and new year closure dates
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has confirmed the dates over the Christmas and new year period in which Crown Courts, magistrates’ courts,...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
View all articles
Authors

LEAVE TO REMOVE: Re B (Leave to Remove) [2006] EWHC 1783 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:19 PM
Slug : re-b-leave-to-remove-2006-ewhc-1783-fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jul 19, 2006, 04:23 AM
Article ID : 89123

(Sumner J; Family Division; 19 July 2006)

The father was a gay man who on invitation supplied the mother, his sister's lesbian partner, with sperm for use in artificial insemination. After the birth, notwithstanding prior agreement, the father sought to be treated as a parent, rather than as an uncle. Conflict between the parties escalated. The mother twice removed the child from the jurisdiction, once in direct contravention of a court order, and twice made allegations, subsequently proved to be unfounded, that the father had sexually abused the child. The father expended considerable time and money on pursuing regular contact. The mother now sought leave to move to the USA. Her own elderly mother lived in the USA, and, although unemployed in the UK for some years, she had been offered employment by a US firm. The father opposed the application on the basis that the mother would use the move to sever the hard-won relationship between father and child.

This was a genuine, strongly reasoned, practical application by the mother to relocate to the USA. The effect on the mother of refusing leave would be dramatic and long lasting, and the impact of this on the mother's care of the child was one of the decisive factors. In addition, the only real prospect for an improvement to the current atmosphere of conflict and mutual mistrust was for the mother to move to the USA, reducing pressure and increasing stability. The father's contact with the child should continue and be developed. Significant conditions were attached to the grant of leave, including mirror orders, and appropriate undertakings, the parents beginning to communicate with each other, and money from the sale of the mother's English property to be held to the order of the court to provide the father with reassurances as to contact.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from