Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Practical aspects to assessing competence in children
Rebecca Stevens, Partner, Royds Withy KingThis is an article regarding the practical aspects to assessing competence in children. The article explores a range of practicalities, such as meeting a...
Scrumping the crop of recent pension decisions
Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Conduct in financial remedies – when is it now a relevant consideration?
Rachel Gillman, 1 GC/Family LawThis article provides an overview of all aspects of financial misconduct following the recent decision of Mostyn J in OG v AG [2020] EWFC 52, wherein all aspects of...
The treatment of RSUs/Stock Options in light of XW v XH
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
View all articles
Authors

CARE PROCEEDINGS: Re B (Evidence: Expert Evidence)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:21 PM
Slug : re-b-evidence-expert-evidence
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Feb 18, 2010, 09:26 AM
Article ID : 86133

(Court of Appeal; Wilson LJ and Pitchford J; 18 February 2010)

The Official Solicitor was instructed on behalf of parents with disabilities. The local authority had instructed a consultant psychiatrist and a family support service had been jointly instructed. They recommended that all 5 children be placed away from the parents permanently, however, they also advised that a child and family psychiatrist assess the family's needs. The local authority gave the task to an in-house team of social workers.

The Official Solicitor applied for permission to instruct a consultant child and adolescent forensic psychiatrist. The judge refused on basis that would provide nothing new and would involve unnecessary delay.

The appeal was allowed. The expertise of social workers is different to that of psychiatrists. Courts should be very slow to reject the application of the Official Solicitor to instruct an expert whose opinion would be pertinent to a case concerning an incapacitated litigant.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from