Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Queer(y)ing consummation: an empirical reflection on the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 and the role of consummation
Alexander Maine, Lecturer in Law, Leicester Law School, University of LeicesterKeywords: Consummation – adultery – marriage – empirical research – LGBTQConsummation and...
A v A (Return Without Taking Parent) [2021] EWHC 1439 (Fam)
(Family Division, MacDonald J, 18 May 2021)Abduction – Application for return order under Hague Convention 1980 - Art 13(b) defence – Whether mother’s allegations against the father...
Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers
The Insurance Charities have released an update to the Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers.Employers have a duty of care and a legal responsibility to provide a safe and effective work...
Two-week rapid consultation launched on remote, hybrid and in-person family hearings
The President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, has announced the launch of a two-week rapid consultation on remote, hybrid and in-person hearings in the family justice system and the...
Pension sharing orders: Finch v Baker
The Court of Appeal judgment in Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72 was released on 28 January 2021. The judgment provides some useful guidance on not being able to get what are essentially...
View all articles
Authors

PROPERTY: Re B (Criminal Justice Act 1988) [2008] EWHC 690 (Admin)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:10 PM
Slug : re-b-criminal-justice-act-1988-2008-ewhc-690-admin
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Apr 11, 2008, 04:22 AM
Article ID : 87173

(Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court; Cranston J; 11 April 2008)

Shortly before the husband pleaded guilty to excise fraud, and a confiscation order was made against him, the husband transferred his only asset, a half share in the matrimonial property, to the wife for no monetary value, the wife having remortgaged the property in her sole name. The wife had been the household breadwinner for some years, because of the husband's long-term illness, and had been unable to remortgage the property jointly with the husband because of the husband's debts.

The transfer of the husband's interest in the property had not been made to avoid the consequences of the husband's guilty plea and the resulting confiscation order; the evidence had established that the transfer had instead been an attempt to place the family finances in order, and had been recommended by the financial institutions advising the wife. However, the transfer had still been a gift to wife, and was accordingly available to pay the husband's confiscation order.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from