Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
One in four family lawyers contemplates leaving the profession, Resolution reveals
A quarter of family justice professionals are on the verge of quitting the profession as the toll of lockdown on their mental health becomes clear, the family law group Resolution revealed today,...
Family Law Awards adds a Wellbeing Award - enter now
This past year has been different for everyone, but family law professionals working on the front line of family justice have faced a more challenging, stressful and demanding time than most. To...
Pension sharing orders: Finch v Baker
The Court of Appeal judgment in Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72 was released on 28 January 2021. The judgment provides some useful guidance on not being able to get what are essentially...
Eight things you need to know: Personal Injury damages in divorce cases
The “pre-acquired” or “non-matrimonial” argument is one which has taken up much commentary in family law circles over recent years.  However, the conundrum can be even...
Misogyny as a hate crime – what it means and why it’s needed
In recent weeks, the government announced that it will instruct all police forces across the UK to start recording crimes motivated by sex or gender on an experimental basis- effectively making...
View all articles
Authors

Re Al M (Fact-finding) [2019] EWHC 3415 (Fam)

Apr 28, 2020, 12:12 PM
Fact-finding – Mother making allegations against father – Whether allegations were proved
The Family Division held that, looking at the fact-finding exercise as a whole, save for some limited exceptions, the mother had proved her case with respect to the factual allegations that she had made.
Slug :
Meta Title : Re Al M (Fact-finding) [2019] EWHC 3415 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Fact-finding – Mother making allegations against father – Whether allegations were proved
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Apr 27, 2020, 23:00 PM
Article ID :

(Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane P, 11 December 2019)

Fact-finding – Mother making allegations against father – Whether allegations were proved

The Family Division held that, looking at the fact-finding exercise as a whole, save for some limited exceptions, the mother had proved her case with respect to the factual allegations that she had made.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.

 


Neutral Citation Number: [2019] EWHC 3415 (Fam)

Case No: FD19P00246, FD19P00380, FD19F05020, FD19F00064

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 11/12/2019

Before :

The Rt Hon Sir Andrew McFarlane

President of the Family Division

 

Re Al M

 

Lord Pannick QC, Alex Verdan QC, Sudhanshu Swaroop QC, Desmond Browne QC, Lewis Marks QC, Patrick Gibbs QC, Daniel Bentham and Adam Speker (instructed by Stewarts Law) for the Applicant Father
Charles Geekie QC, Tim Otty QC, Guglielmo Verdirame QC, Sharon Segal, Kate Parlett and Isabel Buchanan (instructed by Payne Hicks Beach) for the Respondent Mother

Deirdre Fottrell QC and Thomas Wilson (instructed by Cafcass Legal) for the second and third Respondent Children

Hearing dates: 11th, 12th, 13th and 15th November 2019

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Approved Judgment

I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic.

.............................

SIR ANDREW MCFARLANE

The release of this judgment to nominated members of the UK press is subject to a four hour embargo ending at 4pm on 5 March 2020 pursuant to the Order of the President of the Family Division dated 5 March 2020. Publication of any part of this judgment before that time is prohibited by that Order.

After the judgment has been published at 4pm on 5 March 2020 it is important to stress that certain reporting restrictions will remain in force pursuant to the Reporting Restriction Orders made by the President of the Family Division dated 28 January 2020 and 3 February 2020. The Reporting Restriction Orders have been served on the media; copies are available from the Royal Courts of Justice Press Office.

Judgment: Re Al M (Factfinding) [2019] EWHC 3415 (Fam)

 

Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Publicity and Reporting
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from