Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

RESIDENCE: Re A (Residence Order)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:06 PM
Slug : re-a-residence-order
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Oct 7, 2009, 04:22 AM
Article ID : 85889

(Court of Appeal; Thorpe and Thomas LJJ and Coleridge J; 7 October 2009)

After the break down of the marriage the mother refused to allow contact between the father and the three children. During contact proceedings the mother alleged domestic violence and an assault by the father on one of the children. At a hearing the mother conceded that she would not be relying on the alleged domestic violence and stated that she was prepared to co-operate in establishing contact. Shortly afterwards she withdrew that concession. At the conclusion of the fact-finding hearing the judge, who regarded both parents as unreliable witnesses, dismissed the mother's allegation that the father had assaulted one of the children.

Shortly before the next hearing, the mother filed a statement in which she professed to accept generous contact to father, provided the court made a residence order in her favour. The judge concluded that she could not rely on the mother, and made a residence order in the father's favour.

The mother appealed, arguing that the judge had focused on the mother's true approach to contact, not on the risk of shifting the children's residence from the mother's home to the father's home and balancing that against the risks that would arise if the mother's proposals were endorsed.

Allowing the appeal, the assessment of the mother's true position in relation to contact had been important but not crucial.

Significantly, there had thus far been no attempt to introduce a contact regime. There was no clear history of the mother disregarding contact orders.

The transfer of residence was a weapon of very last resort. The judge's order had accordingly been premature, and too risky for the children.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from