Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Resolution issues Brexit notes for family lawyers ahead of IP completion day
Family lawyer organisation, Resolution, has issued two joint notes to assist family lawyers in England and Wales ahead of the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period at 11 pm on 31 December...
Online filing is real-time on New Year's Eve: practice direction change to accommodate EU withdrawal arrangements
I have heard that there will be an amendment to the relevant practice directions to provide that online applications received on New Year’s Eve after 4:30 PM and before 11:00 PM will count as...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
View all articles
Authors

FAMILY PROCEEDINGS: Re A (Non Molestation Proceedings by a Child) [2009] NIFam 22

Sep 29, 2018, 17:27 PM
Slug : re-a-non-molestation-proceedings-by-a-child-2009-nifam-22
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Nov 12, 2009, 04:44 AM
Article ID : 86487

(Northern Ireland Family Division; Stephens J; 12 November 2009)

The child applied for a non-molestation order and an occupation order, alleging violence by the mother in the father's absence. Although the child had special educational needs, an e-mail from the child's solicitors asserted that a solicitor had met the child and deemed him competent. After the father witnessed the mother's threatening response when she opened the child's application, the father and child left the matrimonial home and thereafter contact between the mother and child was supervised.

Careful consideration must be given prior to a child commencing proceedings in the High Court against a parent as to whether it was more appropriate for the proceedings to be commenced not by the child but by the other parent in a family proceedings court. Absent a statement as to the solicitor's assessment of the child's understanding, or other relevant, information the court could not, except in the most exceptional circumstances, exercise discretion to grant leave to commence proceedings. The father could have commenced proceedings in his own name, seeking a non-molestation application to protect the child; an associated person, such as the father, could commence proceedings for a non-molestation order in order to protect a relevant child, even though the associated person needed no protection. Conditions attached to a residence order should not be used to oust a parent from his or her home, nor should such conditions be used to provide protection from molestation. The child was not entitled to apply for an occupation order, not being an associated person within the legislation; however, the father was entitled to do so, and again such an order could be made for the benefit of the child, as a related child.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from