Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
View all articles
Authors

CONTACT: Re A and Another (Contact)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:10 PM
Slug : re-a-and-another-contact
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : May 14, 2008, 04:22 AM
Article ID : 87185

(Court of Appeal; Thorpe, Wall and Stanley Burnton LJJ; 14 May 2008)

There were various hearings between the parents as to the fathers contact with the two children. A guardian was appointed to represent the children. At a fact-finding hearing the father, who had a previous conviction for assault against the mother, was found to have assaulted her. The father persisted in denying strongly any episode of past violence against the mother. At a hearing listed as the final hearing of the fathers application for contact, the judge adjourned the case for over 6 months, ordering indirect contact between the father and the children, and giving the guardian leave to arrange supervised contact. The preamble to the order expressed the hope that the mother would seek counselling and that the father would obtain anger management training. The guardian appealed, supported by mother.

The postponement had been pointless, as the steps proposed by the judge were unrealistic or unachievable. The judges order was set aside; the court made a 6 month family assistance order in respect of the mother and the children, and a s 91(14) order in respect of the father.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from