Latest articles
UK Immigration Rough Sleeper Rule
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsThe UK government has recently introduced a controversial new set of rules that aim to make rough sleeping grounds for refusal or cancellation of a migrant’s...
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
View all articles
Authors

CONTACT: Re A and Another (Contact)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:10 PM
Slug : re-a-and-another-contact
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : May 14, 2008, 04:22 AM
Article ID : 87185

(Court of Appeal; Thorpe, Wall and Stanley Burnton LJJ; 14 May 2008)

There were various hearings between the parents as to the fathers contact with the two children. A guardian was appointed to represent the children. At a fact-finding hearing the father, who had a previous conviction for assault against the mother, was found to have assaulted her. The father persisted in denying strongly any episode of past violence against the mother. At a hearing listed as the final hearing of the fathers application for contact, the judge adjourned the case for over 6 months, ordering indirect contact between the father and the children, and giving the guardian leave to arrange supervised contact. The preamble to the order expressed the hope that the mother would seek counselling and that the father would obtain anger management training. The guardian appealed, supported by mother.

The postponement had been pointless, as the steps proposed by the judge were unrealistic or unachievable. The judges order was set aside; the court made a 6 month family assistance order in respect of the mother and the children, and a s 91(14) order in respect of the father.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from