Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

ABDUCTION: Re A (Abduction: Habitual Residence) [2007] EWHC 779 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 16:33 PM
Slug : re-a-abduction-habitual-residence-2007-ewhc-779-fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Apr 11, 2007, 05:05 AM
Article ID : 85365

(Family Division; Sumner J; 4 April 2007)

The mother and child travelled out to the USA to join the father with a settled intention to remain there, but within a few days it became clear that the marriage was over and on the 8th day after arrival the mother informed the father that she would return to England. The father consented to the return, although the father's case was that he had consented only on the basis that the child would be returning to the USA 4 months later. The father eventually sought the summary return of the child under the Hague Convention.

The period of 7 or 8 days was too short for the acquisition of habitual residence. If it was possible to acquire habitual residence in a period of 7 days, it had not been sufficient in this case, because the mother had changed her mind so quickly after arrival in the US and had never settled in the US. The child had, with the mother, lost habitual residence in the UK when the mother travelled out to the US with the settled intention of residing in the US, but had not acquired a new habitual residence before returning to England. In any event, the court found that the father had consented to the child's permanent return to the UK and had understood that although the child would come back to the US after 4 months, that would be for a visit only.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from