Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
The suspension, during lockdown, of prison visits for children: was it lawful?
Jake Richards, 9 Gough ChambersThis article argues that the suspension on prison visits during this period and the deficiency of measures to mitigate the impact of this on family life and to protect...
View all articles
Authors

ABDUCTION: Re A (Abduction: Habitual Residence) [2007] EWHC 779 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 16:33 PM
Slug : re-a-abduction-habitual-residence-2007-ewhc-779-fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Apr 11, 2007, 05:05 AM
Article ID : 85365

(Family Division; Sumner J; 4 April 2007)

The mother and child travelled out to the USA to join the father with a settled intention to remain there, but within a few days it became clear that the marriage was over and on the 8th day after arrival the mother informed the father that she would return to England. The father consented to the return, although the father's case was that he had consented only on the basis that the child would be returning to the USA 4 months later. The father eventually sought the summary return of the child under the Hague Convention.

The period of 7 or 8 days was too short for the acquisition of habitual residence. If it was possible to acquire habitual residence in a period of 7 days, it had not been sufficient in this case, because the mother had changed her mind so quickly after arrival in the US and had never settled in the US. The child had, with the mother, lost habitual residence in the UK when the mother travelled out to the US with the settled intention of residing in the US, but had not acquired a new habitual residence before returning to England. In any event, the court found that the father had consented to the child's permanent return to the UK and had understood that although the child would come back to the US after 4 months, that would be for a visit only.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from