Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirms 2020 Christmas and new year closure dates
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has confirmed the dates over the Christmas and new year period in which Crown Courts, magistrates’ courts,...
View all articles
Authors

RESIDENCE: RAB v MIB [2008] CSIH 52

Sep 29, 2018, 17:37 PM
Slug : rab-v-mib-2008-csih-52
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Sep 9, 2008, 06:26 AM
Article ID : 88793

(Extra Division, Inner House, Court of Session; Lord Eassie, Lady Paton, Lord Mackay of Drumadoon; 9 September 2008)

The couple were habitually resident in Scotland with the child. Without the father's consent the mother took the child to London, where she obtained an ex parte residence order from the English court. The father challenged the order on the basis that the English court had no jurisdiction, but was unsuccessful. The father later began divorce proceedings in Scotland, raising issues concerning the child's residence and future contact arrangements; the mother succeeded in obtaining a stay of those issues from the Scottish court on the basis that Scotland was forum non conveniens.

The test for forum non-conveniens was not the practical convenience of witnesses, but whether the alternative forum contended for was one in which 'the case may be tried more suitably for the interests of all the parties and the ends of justice'. The jurisdiction of the local Scottish court was established as of right and, as the court of the dissolution of the marriage, it not only had primary jurisdiction in respect of the welfare of the child of the marriage, but also the duty to satisfy itself that the welfare arrangements were appropriate. That jurisdiction could be abdicated only in exceptional circumstances, which were not present in this case.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from