Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Help separated parents ditch avoidance strategies that stop them resolving differences
The desire to avoid conflict with an ex is the primary reason that separated parents do not get to see their children.  That’s an eye-opening finding from a survey of 1,105 separated...
What is a Cohabitation Agreement, and do I need one?
Many couples, despite living together, never seek to legally formalise their living and financial arrangements.  They mistakenly believe that the concept of a ‘common law’ husband and...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 22 February 2021)Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19...
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
View all articles
Authors

SENTENCING: R v P [2007] EWCA Crim 1852

Sep 29, 2018, 17:34 PM
Slug : r-v-p-2007-ewca-crim-1852
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jul 13, 2007, 05:14 AM
Article ID : 88391

(Court of Appeal; Hooper LJ, McCombe and Openshaw JJ; 13 July 2007)

The father had been living with the mother, three step-children, and three children. Following an injury to the youngest child, then 2, inflicted in the father's absence, a police officer visited the home and reported on the unsatisfactory state of the children's living conditions. A few months later the mother slashed the youngest child with a shard of broken glass while the father was at work. Conditions in the home were unchanged. The mother was convicted of a series of offences, including wounding with intent. The father pleaded guilty to 6 counts of cruelty to children by neglect, on the basis that for a period of 4 months he had failed to provide sufficient care, having worked excessive hours to provide for family, become exhausted and stressed, and thus failed to sufficiently to play his part in the day-to-day care of the children. The father had no previous convictions. The pre-sentence report made it clear that the father was deeply remorseful. The father had been diagnosed with depression. There was evidence that if the father went to prison it was likely that he would lose his job, held for nearly 20 years, and his house. The judge sentenced him to 7 months imprisonment on each count, concurrent.

The plea had been made on a limited basis, not reflected in the sentence. Further, this was not a case of deliberate assault, but of low grade neglect, within a limited period of time, characterized by a general failure of care as a result of which the children had ceased to thrive and to meet developmental milestones. The father had been faced with a series of serious problems he could not deal with. He could and should have sought help, but failure to do so was a further sign of his inadequacy and the magnitude of his problems. This was not a case calling for punishment, but for leniency, indeed mercy; the father required help and assistance. The sentences of imprisonment were quashed, and substituted with a probation order on each count, to run for 12 months.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from