Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 22 February 2021)Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19...
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
View all articles
Authors

R v K [2018] EWFC 59

Sep 29, 2018, 22:13 PM
Financial remedies – Company assets – 25-year marriage – Assertion of extensive business liabilities – Failure to comply with maintenance pending suit order – Division of assets
The wife was awarded a lump sum of £2m to be paid within 2 years in addition to periodical payments in relation to the youngest child of £3,000 pm.
Slug : r-v-k-2018-ewfc-59
Meta Title : R v K [2018] EWFC 59
Meta Keywords : Financial remedies – Company assets – 25-year marriage – Assertion of extensive business liabilities – Failure to comply with maintenance pending suit order – Division of assets
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Sep 12, 2018, 10:03 AM
Article ID : 117374

(Family Court, Baker J, 4 September 2018)

Financial remedies – Company assets – 25-year marriage – Assertion of extensive business liabilities – Failure to comply with maintenance pending suit order – Division of assets

The wife was awarded a lump sum of £2m to be paid within 2 years in addition to periodical payments in relation to the youngest child of £3,000 pm.




For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482. 

Neutral Citation Number: [2018] EWFC 59
Case No:
IN THE FAMILY COURT
Sitting at the Royal Courts of Justice.

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL
Date: 4 September 2018

Before :
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE BAKER

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Between :

R
Applicant

- and -

K
Respondent

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Timothy Bishop QC and Katherine Cook (instructed by Payne Hicks Beach) for the Applicant
Martin Pointer QC and Judith Murray (instructed by Penningtons Manches) for the Respondent

Hearing dates: 26 – 28, February, 2, 5 – 9, 27 March, 18 April 2018

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Approved Judgment

I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic.

.............................

MR JUSTICE BAKER

This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.

Judgment:
R v K [2018] EWFC 59.pdf
Categories :
  • Financial Remedies
  • Judgments
Tags :
FLR_cover
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from