Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
Online event: An update on recovery in the civil, family courts & tribunals
HM Courts and Tribunals Service has announced that it is holding an online event to discuss its recovery plan for the civil, family courts and tribunals, which was published on 9 November 2020...
HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirms 2020 Christmas and new year closure dates
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has confirmed the dates over the Christmas and new year period in which Crown Courts, magistrates’ courts,...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
Focusing on behaviour and attitudes of separating parents
I am sure that if this year's Family Law Awards were an in-person event as usual, rather than this year’s virtual occasion, much of the chatter among family law professionals would be...
View all articles
Authors

R (The Public Law Project) v Lord Chancellor [2016] UKSC 39

Sep 29, 2018, 21:19 PM
This appeal concerns the lawfulness of a proposal by the Lord Chancellor (then The Rt Hon Christopher Grayling MP) in September 2013 to introduce a residence test for civil legal aid by amending Schedule 1 to the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (“LASPO”), by means of delegated legislation, in the form of a statutory instrument, which I will refer to as “the draft order”.
Slug : r-the-public-law-project-v-lord-chancellor-2016-uksc-39
Meta Title : R (The Public Law Project) v Lord Chancellor [2016] UKSC 39
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jul 13, 2016, 08:46 AM
Article ID : 114868
(Supreme Court, Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Reed, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hughes and Lord Toulson, 13 July 2016)


Trinity Term
[2016] UKSC 39
On appeal from: [2015] EWCA Civ 1193

JUDGMENT

R (on the application of The Public Law Project)
(Appellant)
v
Lord Chancellor
(Respondent)

before
Lord Neuberger, President
Lady Hale, Deputy President
Lord Mance
Lord Reed
Lord Carnwath
Lord Hughes
Lord Toulson

JUDGMENT GIVEN ON
13 July 2016
Heard on 18 April 2016

Appellant
Michael Fordham QC
Ben Jaffey 
Naina Patel
James Eadie QC
(Instructed by Bindmans LLP)

Respondent
Patrick Goodall QC
 Simon Pritchard
Alison Pickup
David Lowe
(Instructed by The Government Legal Department
)

Intervener (Office of the
Children’s Commissioner)
Written submissions only
Paul Bowen QC
Eric Metcalfe
Catherine Meredith
(Instructed by Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP)

Intervener (The Law
Society)
Written submissions only
Dinah Rose QC
Iain Steele
(Instructed by The Law Society)


Judgment
Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Practice and Procedure
Tags :
UKSC_Supreme_Court
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from