Latest articles
UK Immigration Rough Sleeper Rule
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsThe UK government has recently introduced a controversial new set of rules that aim to make rough sleeping grounds for refusal or cancellation of a migrant’s...
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
View all articles
Authors

R (The Public Law Project) v Lord Chancellor [2016] UKSC 39

Sep 29, 2018, 21:19 PM
This appeal concerns the lawfulness of a proposal by the Lord Chancellor (then The Rt Hon Christopher Grayling MP) in September 2013 to introduce a residence test for civil legal aid by amending Schedule 1 to the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (“LASPO”), by means of delegated legislation, in the form of a statutory instrument, which I will refer to as “the draft order”.
Slug : r-the-public-law-project-v-lord-chancellor-2016-uksc-39
Meta Title : R (The Public Law Project) v Lord Chancellor [2016] UKSC 39
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jul 13, 2016, 08:46 AM
Article ID : 114868
(Supreme Court, Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Reed, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hughes and Lord Toulson, 13 July 2016)


Trinity Term
[2016] UKSC 39
On appeal from: [2015] EWCA Civ 1193

JUDGMENT

R (on the application of The Public Law Project)
(Appellant)
v
Lord Chancellor
(Respondent)

before
Lord Neuberger, President
Lady Hale, Deputy President
Lord Mance
Lord Reed
Lord Carnwath
Lord Hughes
Lord Toulson

JUDGMENT GIVEN ON
13 July 2016
Heard on 18 April 2016

Appellant
Michael Fordham QC
Ben Jaffey 
Naina Patel
James Eadie QC
(Instructed by Bindmans LLP)

Respondent
Patrick Goodall QC
 Simon Pritchard
Alison Pickup
David Lowe
(Instructed by The Government Legal Department
)

Intervener (Office of the
Children’s Commissioner)
Written submissions only
Paul Bowen QC
Eric Metcalfe
Catherine Meredith
(Instructed by Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP)

Intervener (The Law
Society)
Written submissions only
Dinah Rose QC
Iain Steele
(Instructed by The Law Society)


Judgment
Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Practice and Procedure
Tags :
UKSC_Supreme_Court
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from