Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
The suspension, during lockdown, of prison visits for children: was it lawful?
Jake Richards, 9 Gough ChambersThis article argues that the suspension on prison visits during this period and the deficiency of measures to mitigate the impact of this on family life and to protect...
View all articles
Authors

CHILD SUPPORT/JUDICIAL REVIEW: R (Mantle) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions

Sep 29, 2018, 16:12 PM
Slug : r-mantle-v-secretary-of-state-for-work-and-pensions
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 30, 2008, 05:41 AM
Article ID : 84863

(Queen's Bench Division; King J; 30 June 2008)

The appeal tribunal allowed the mother's appeal against an assessment of the maintenance to be paid by the father, and recalculated the maintenance figure. The father's subsequent appeal was rejected. The father's appeal to the Commissioner's Office was significantly out of time, and the Commissioner refused to consider it. The father sought leave to judicially review the Commissioner's decision.

Refusing permission for judicial review, the court noted that there was a residual jurisdiction to allow judicial review of the Commissioner's decision, by analogy with the jurisdiction to allow judicial review of a decision of a county court refusing permission to appeal, but such jurisdiction was narrowly confined to 'errors of law going to jurisdiction', or cases in which there had been a clear breach of natural justice. This case was outside that narrow jurisdiction.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from