Latest articles
UK Immigration Rough Sleeper Rule
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsThe UK government has recently introduced a controversial new set of rules that aim to make rough sleeping grounds for refusal or cancellation of a migrant’s...
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
View all articles
Authors

LOCAL AUTHORITY/SECURE ACCOMMODATION: R (M) v Gateshead Metropolitan Borough Council [2006] EWCA Civ 221

Sep 29, 2018, 17:06 PM
Slug : r-m-v-gateshead-metropolitan-borough-council-2006-ewca-civ-221
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 14, 2006, 04:22 AM
Article ID : 85811

(Court of Appeal; Thorpe, Dyson and Moore-Bick LJJ; 14 March 2006) [2006] 2 FLR 379

A local authority which received a request under s 38(6) of Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 to accommodate an arrested juvenile was under a duty to provide accommodation, under Children Act 1989, s 21(2)(b), whether or not it was the authority in whose area the child was located at the time of the request. The duty was a duty to accommodate, not necessarily to provide secure accommodation, but the authority had a discretionary power to provide secure accommodation where that was requested. Therefore, all local authorities must have in place reasonable systems to enable them to respond to requests made under s 38(6) for secure accommodation. The court expressed the view that arrangements made by local authorities should be struck down as unlawful only if an authority had made no arrangements at all, so that they could never provide secure accommodation when it was requested, or where the arrangements made could not have been made by a reasonable authority mindful of the need to avoid having children detained in police cells if at all possible.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from