Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirms 2020 Christmas and new year closure dates
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has confirmed the dates over the Christmas and new year period in which Crown Courts, magistrates’ courts,...
View all articles
Authors

LOCAL AUTHORITY/SECURE ACCOMMODATION: R (M) v Gateshead Metropolitan Borough Council [2006] EWCA Civ 221

Sep 29, 2018, 17:06 PM
Slug : r-m-v-gateshead-metropolitan-borough-council-2006-ewca-civ-221
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 14, 2006, 04:22 AM
Article ID : 85811

(Court of Appeal; Thorpe, Dyson and Moore-Bick LJJ; 14 March 2006) [2006] 2 FLR 379

A local authority which received a request under s 38(6) of Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 to accommodate an arrested juvenile was under a duty to provide accommodation, under Children Act 1989, s 21(2)(b), whether or not it was the authority in whose area the child was located at the time of the request. The duty was a duty to accommodate, not necessarily to provide secure accommodation, but the authority had a discretionary power to provide secure accommodation where that was requested. Therefore, all local authorities must have in place reasonable systems to enable them to respond to requests made under s 38(6) for secure accommodation. The court expressed the view that arrangements made by local authorities should be struck down as unlawful only if an authority had made no arrangements at all, so that they could never provide secure accommodation when it was requested, or where the arrangements made could not have been made by a reasonable authority mindful of the need to avoid having children detained in police cells if at all possible.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from