Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Practical aspects to assessing competence in children
Rebecca Stevens, Partner, Royds Withy KingThis is an article regarding the practical aspects to assessing competence in children. The article explores a range of practicalities, such as meeting a...
Scrumping the crop of recent pension decisions
Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Conduct in financial remedies – when is it now a relevant consideration?
Rachel Gillman, 1 GC/Family LawThis article provides an overview of all aspects of financial misconduct following the recent decision of Mostyn J in OG v AG [2020] EWFC 52, wherein all aspects of...
The treatment of RSUs/Stock Options in light of XW v XH
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
View all articles
Authors

MEDICAL TREATMENT: Quintavelle v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority [2005] UKHL 28

Sep 29, 2018, 17:21 PM
Slug : quintavelle-v-human-fertilisation-and-embryology-authority-2005-ukhl-28
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Apr 28, 2005, 04:22 AM
Article ID : 86079

(28 April 2005; Lord Steyn, Lord Hoffmann, Lord Scott of Foscote, Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe and Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood; House of Lords) [2005] 2 FLR 349, [2005] The Times April 29

A couple whose young son had been born with a life-threatening genetic blood disorder wished to conceive a child free of the disease, but also wished the child to be of a tissue type to match that of their son, so that stem cells from blood taken from the umbilical cord of the baby could be used to try to cure the son. The HFEA granted a licence to permit tests to be carried out as part of the couple's IVF treatment, screening for genetic defects in the embryo and identifying whether the embryo had the same tissue type as the son. Both screening of embryos to produce a child free from genetic defects, and tissue typing of embryos to produce a child with stem cells matching a sick or dying sibling, could lawfully be authorised by the HFEA as activities to determine the suitability of the embryo for implantation. The HFEA was right to decide that the Act authorised it to licence treatment for the purpose of tissue typing.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from