Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
One in four family lawyers contemplates leaving the profession, Resolution reveals
A quarter of family justice professionals are on the verge of quitting the profession as the toll of lockdown on their mental health becomes clear, the family law group Resolution revealed today,...
Family Law Awards adds a Wellbeing Award - enter now
This past year has been different for everyone, but family law professionals working on the front line of family justice have faced a more challenging, stressful and demanding time than most. To...
Pension sharing orders: Finch v Baker
The Court of Appeal judgment in Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72 was released on 28 January 2021. The judgment provides some useful guidance on not being able to get what are essentially...
Eight things you need to know: Personal Injury damages in divorce cases
The “pre-acquired” or “non-matrimonial” argument is one which has taken up much commentary in family law circles over recent years.  However, the conundrum can be even...
Misogyny as a hate crime – what it means and why it’s needed
In recent weeks, the government announced that it will instruct all police forces across the UK to start recording crimes motivated by sex or gender on an experimental basis- effectively making...
View all articles
Authors

MEDICAL TREATMENT: Quintavelle v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority [2005] UKHL 28

Sep 29, 2018, 17:21 PM
Slug : quintavelle-v-human-fertilisation-and-embryology-authority-2005-ukhl-28
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Apr 28, 2005, 04:22 AM
Article ID : 86079

(28 April 2005; Lord Steyn, Lord Hoffmann, Lord Scott of Foscote, Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe and Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood; House of Lords) [2005] 2 FLR 349, [2005] The Times April 29

A couple whose young son had been born with a life-threatening genetic blood disorder wished to conceive a child free of the disease, but also wished the child to be of a tissue type to match that of their son, so that stem cells from blood taken from the umbilical cord of the baby could be used to try to cure the son. The HFEA granted a licence to permit tests to be carried out as part of the couple's IVF treatment, screening for genetic defects in the embryo and identifying whether the embryo had the same tissue type as the son. Both screening of embryos to produce a child free from genetic defects, and tissue typing of embryos to produce a child with stem cells matching a sick or dying sibling, could lawfully be authorised by the HFEA as activities to determine the suitability of the embryo for implantation. The HFEA was right to decide that the Act authorised it to licence treatment for the purpose of tissue typing.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from