Family Law

News
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
26 NOV 2020
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
26 NOV 2020
HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirms 2020 Christmas and new year closure...
26 NOV 2020
New Cafcass guidance on working with children during COVID-19
26 NOV 2020
Online event: An update on recovery in the civil, family courts & tribunals...
20 NOV 2020
Book your free place at the Family Law Awards 2020 now!
17 NOV 2020
View all news
Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
View similar products
Family Court Practice, The
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2020 edition due out in May
View similar products
Available in LexisNexis@Library
Court of Protection Practice 2020
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
View similar products
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
View similar products
Available in LexisNexis@Library
Spotlight
Latest articles
Practical aspects to assessing competence in children
Practical aspects to assessing competence in children
Rebecca Stevens, Partner, Royds Withy KingThis is an article regarding the practical aspects to assessing competence in children. The article explores a range of practicalities, such as meeting a...
Article 29 NOV 2020
Scrumping the crop of recent pension decisions
Scrumping the crop of recent pension decisions
Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Article 30 NOV 2020
Conduct in financial remedies – when is it now a relevant consideration?
Conduct in financial remedies – when is it now a relevant consideration?
Rachel Gillman, 1 GC/Family LawThis article provides an overview of all aspects of financial misconduct following the recent decision of Mostyn J in OG v AG [2020] EWFC 52, wherein all aspects of...
Article 30 NOV 2020
The treatment of RSUs/Stock Options in light of XW v XH
The treatment of RSUs/Stock Options in light of XW v XH
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
Article 30 NOV 2020
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
Alexander Sverdlov
Article 27 NOV 2020
View all articles
Latest articles
View all articles
Authors
Author
Alexander Sverdlov
Author
David Hodson OBE MCIArb
Author
Dianne Millen
Author
Sarah Williams
Author
Megan Bennie
Author
Alexandra Bishop
View all authors

Quan v Bray and others [2017] EWCA Civ 405

Sep 29, 2018, 20:00 PM
Financial remedies – Trust assets – Appeal from finding that they were not a resource of the parties – Sufficiency of reasoning
Slug : quan-v-bray-and-others-2017-ewca-civ-405
Meta Title : Quan v Bray and others [2017] EWCA Civ 405
Meta Keywords : Financial remedies – Trust assets – Appeal from finding that they were not a resource of the parties – Sufficiency of reasoning
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 21, 2017, 04:33 AM
Article ID : 114223

(Court of Appeal, King, David Richards and Moylan LJJ, 16 June 2017)

Financial remedies – Trust assets – Appeal from finding that they were not a resource of the parties – Sufficiency of reasoning
For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482. 

Case No: B6/2015/0102

Neutral Citation Number: [2017] EWCA Civ 405
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT
FAMILY DIVISION (RCJ)
Sir Paul Coleridge sitting as a High Court Judge
[2014] EWHC 3340 (Fam)

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 16/06/2017

Before:

LADY JUSTICE KING
LORD JUSTICE DAVID RICHARDS
and
LORD JUSTICE MOYLAN

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between:

Li Quan
Appellant

- and -

Stuart Bray
1st Respondent

Maitland (Mauritius) Ltd
2nd Respondent

Chinese Tigers South African Trust
3rd Respondent

Save China’s Tigers
4th Respondent

Ralph Edmond Bray
5th Respondent

Conservation Finance Limited
6th Respondent

The Attorney General
7th Respondent

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Richard Todd QC and Lily Mottahedan (instructed by Vardags Solicitors) for the Appellant
The First Respondent appeared in person
The Second Respondent did not appear and was not represented
The Third Respondent did not appear and was not represented
The Fourth Respondent appeared in person
The Fifth Respondent did not appear and was not represented
Stewart Leech QC and Sarah Phipps (instructed by Lee and Thompson LLP) for the 
6th Respondent
Ruth Hughes (instructed by The Government Legal Department) for the 7th Respondent

Hearing dates : 31 January to 2 February 2017

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Judgment

Quan v Bray and Others [2017] EWCA Civ 405.rtf
Categories :
  • Financial Remedies
  • Judgments
Tags :
FLR_cover
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles

Leave a comment

Order by

Newest on top Oldest on top
Load more comments
Comment by from
Copyright © 2020 LexisNexis