Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Queer(y)ing consummation: an empirical reflection on the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 and the role of consummation
Alexander Maine, Lecturer in Law, Leicester Law School, University of LeicesterKeywords: Consummation – adultery – marriage – empirical research – LGBTQConsummation and...
A v A (Return Without Taking Parent) [2021] EWHC 1439 (Fam)
(Family Division, MacDonald J, 18 May 2021)Abduction – Application for return order under Hague Convention 1980 - Art 13(b) defence – Whether mother’s allegations against the father...
Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers
The Insurance Charities have released an update to the Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers.Employers have a duty of care and a legal responsibility to provide a safe and effective work...
Two-week rapid consultation launched on remote, hybrid and in-person family hearings
The President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, has announced the launch of a two-week rapid consultation on remote, hybrid and in-person hearings in the family justice system and the...
Pension sharing orders: Finch v Baker
The Court of Appeal judgment in Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72 was released on 28 January 2021. The judgment provides some useful guidance on not being able to get what are essentially...
View all articles
Authors

PS v BP [2018] EWHC 1987 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 22:07 PM
Evidence– Father’s application for Child Arrangements Order - Serious allegations made by mother against father – Father acting as litigant in person, not allowed to cross-examine mother – Father appealed
The High Court allowed the appeal.
Slug : ps-v-bp-2018-ewhc-1987-fam
Meta Title : PS v BP [2018] EWHC 1987 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Evidence– Father’s application for Child Arrangements Order - Serious allegations made by mother against father – Father acting as litigant in person, not allowed to cross-examine mother – Father appealed
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Aug 1, 2018, 04:03 AM
Article ID : 117322

(High Court, Hayden J, 27 July 2018)

Evidence– Father’s application for Child Arrangements Order - Serious allegations made by mother against father – Father acting as litigant in person, not allowed to cross-examine mother – Father appealed

The High Court allowed the appeal.




For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482. 

Neutral Citation Number: [2018] EWHC 1987 (Fam)
Case No: ME17P00309
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
FAMILY DIVISION
ON APPEAL FROM HIS HONOUR JUDGE SCARATT sitting in the Family Court at Canterbury

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL


Date: 27/07/2018

Before :


THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE HAYDEN


 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Between :


PS
Appellant


- and -


BP
Respondent


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Mr L Eaton (instructed by Aletta Shaw Solicitors) for the Appellant
Mr P Hepher (instructed by Brachers LLP) for the Respondent


Hearing date: 18th June 2018


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Judgment Approved


This judgment was delivered in public. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.


Judgment: PS v BP [2018] EWHC 1987 (Fam).rtf

Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Private Law Children
Tags :
FLR_cover
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from