Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

President’s guidance: Judicial participation in OFSTED inspections of local authority children’s services

Sep 29, 2018, 20:02 PM
family law, OFSTED, children's services, President's Guidance
Guidance issued by Sir James Munby, President of the Family Division on 23 June 2017
Slug : president-s-guidance-judicial-participation-in-ofsted-inspections-of-local-authority-children-s-services
Meta Title : President’s guidance: Judicial participation in OFSTED inspections of local authority children’s services
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 28, 2017, 04:36 AM
Article ID : 114241

Guidance issued by Sir James Munby, President of the Family Division on 23 June 2017

Some confusion has arisen over the propriety of judges speaking to OFSTED staff conducting inspections of local authority children’s services. For the avoidance of doubt, it is perfectly legitimate for judges, should they wish to do so, to speak to OFSTED inspectors about the quality of the preparation of public law cases that the local authority brings before the Family Court. It would not, however, be appropriate for judges to give feedback on the performance of individuals.

It is not, of course, mandatory for judges to contribute their views and they are free to decline.

In most cases, OFSTED will contact the local DFJ to request feedback on the local authority and the DFJ will be the most appropriate judge to provide feedback. However, from time to time, it may be helpful for OFSTED to hear from other judges.

If a DFJ becomes aware that an OFSTED inspection is taking place and has not been contacted for feedback then the DFJ is free to contact OFSTED, on their own initiative, should they feel that they have pertinent feedback to contribute to the inspection.

Sir James Munby
President of the Family Division
23 June 2017

Family Law is the title of reference and record in the field of family law since 1970 and is the leading practitioner journal compiled by experts for family law professionals. The journal features the latest official guidances, in-depth case analysis and topical articles.

Family Law journal is available as either a print or online subscription.

 Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of Family Law journal. Please quote: 100482.

Categories :
  • Legislation & Guidance
  • Practice Guidance
Tags :
magnifying_glass
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from