Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Resolution issues Brexit notes for family lawyers ahead of IP completion day
Family lawyer organisation, Resolution, has issued two joint notes to assist family lawyers in England and Wales ahead of the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period at 11 pm on 31 December...
Online filing is real-time on New Year's Eve: practice direction change to accommodate EU withdrawal arrangements
I have heard that there will be an amendment to the relevant practice directions to provide that online applications received on New Year’s Eve after 4:30 PM and before 11:00 PM will count as...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
View all articles
Authors

President’s Circular: Financial Remedies Courts

Sep 29, 2018, 21:57 PM
Family Law, President’s Circular: Financial Remedies Courts,
The need for and the many benefits to be derived from the introduction of a national system of Financial Remedies Courts have been persuasively argued by HHJ Martin O’Dwyer, HHJ Edward Hess and Joanna Miles: Hess and Miles, ‘The recognition of money work as a speciality in the family courts by the creation of a national network of Financial Remedies Units’ [2016] Fam Law 1335, and O’Dwyer, Hess and Miles, ‘Financial Remedies Courts’ [2017] Fam Law 625
Slug : president-s-circular-financial-remedies-courts
Meta Title : President’s Circular: Financial Remedies Courts
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : Yes
Prioritise In Trending Articles : Yes
Date : Dec 1, 2017, 09:48 AM
Article ID : 116198

James Munby

President of the Family Division


The need for and the many benefits to be derived from the introduction of a national system of Financial Remedies Courts have been persuasively argued by HHJ Martin O’Dwyer, HHJ Edward Hess and Joanna Miles: Hess and Miles, ‘The recognition of money work as a speciality in the family courts by the creation of a national network of Financial Remedies Units’ [2016] Fam Law 1335, and O’Dwyer, Hess and Miles, ‘Financial Remedies Courts’ [2017] Fam Law 625. I have made clear my support for this: ‘Note by the President’  [2016] Fam Law 1340, and ‘17th View from the President’s Chambers: divorce and money – where are we and where are we going?’ [2017] Fam Law 607.

Following discussions with HMCTS, I am proposing to pilot the Financial Remedies Court (FRC) concept in three places, starting, I hope, in February 2018: London, the West Midlands and South-East Wales. I envisage that further pilots will follow quite shortly on a rolling programme.

The basic concept, which builds on both the Family Court and regionalised Court of Protection models, is as follows (please note that the terminology is not yet finalised):

  • A number of regional hubs, typically two per circuit (population or geography may require more), at which both the administration (HMCTS) and the judicial leadership for the relevant hub area are based.

  • A lead judge for each hub area: this must be a judge (either a CJ or perhaps a DJ) with real experience/expertise in financial remedy work.

  • A national lead judge with a deputy. Mostyn J and, as his deputy, HHJ Hess have agreed to fill these important positions.

  • Hearings will be conducted (a) at the regional hub and (I emphasise this, because it is very important) also (b) at a number of Financial Remedies Hearing Centres (FRHCs) within the hub area.

  • Initially the FRC will deal with ancillary relief cases; in due course, this will be extended to all financial remedy cases dealt with in the Family Court or Family Division.

  • Only ‘ticketed’ judges will sit in the FRC. All DJs and CJs currently in post who do this work will be ‘grandfathered’ in.

  • The FRC will function quite separately from the Regional Divorce Centres: initially in accordance with the current principles regulating ‘administrative de-linking’, pending full ‘legal de-linking’.

  • Initially, the FRC will function with paper files, as at present, but HMCTS, with my support, is already working on transition by the FRC to a fully digitised model.

It follows from this that three critical issues relate to:

  • The location of the proposed FRC hubs.

  • The locations of the proposed FRHCs.

  • The selection of the lead judge for each FRC hub.

In relation to the three pilots, local discussions on these matters are under way. Thought is also being given to where and when the next wave of pilots should begin.

I have kept the Association of District Judges aware of my thinking.

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Judiciary
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Load more comments
Comment by from