Latest articles
UK Immigration Rough Sleeper Rule
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsThe UK government has recently introduced a controversial new set of rules that aim to make rough sleeping grounds for refusal or cancellation of a migrant’s...
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
View all articles
Authors

President calls for more extensive powers for punishing contempt of court

Sep 29, 2018, 18:59 PM
The President of the Family Division Sir James Munby, has voiced his opinion that the civil courts need ‘more extensive powers' to deal adequately with contempt of court.
Slug : president-calls-for-more-extensive-powers-for-punishing-contempt-of-court
Meta Title : President calls for more extensive powers for punishing contempt of court Re Ramet Application for the Committal to Prison [2014] EWHC 56 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : family law, contempt of court
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 23, 2014, 11:49 AM
Article ID : 104549

The President of the Family Division Sir James Munby, has voiced his opinion that the civil courts need 'more extensive powers' to deal adequately with contempt of court.

Sir James was referring to a child contact case at Chelmsford County Court. After closing submissions, the father, Simon Ramet, attacked his former wife by repeatedly punching her, pulling her hair and kicking her after she had fallen to the floor. When the court clerk went to her assistance he assaulted him too. Mr Ramet was then restrained and arrested.

Section 14 (b) of the County Courts Act 1984 provides that: 'If any person assaults an officer of a court while in the execution of his duty, he shall be liable on an order made by the judge in that behalf, to be committed for a specified period not exceeding 3 months to prison or to such a fine as aforesaid...' However, within the judgment of Re Ramet Application for the Committal to Prison [2014] EWHC 56 (Fam), [2014] 1 FLR (forthcoming), Sir Munby expressed his views that, to his mind, this punishment was not sufficient.

'It is in this context that I have to express serious concerns about the adequacy - in fact, in my opinion, the utter inadequacy in modern conditions - of the statutory penalties available under the 1984 Act. So far as concerns the family justice system I accordingly invite the Family Procedure Rules Committee to consider whether there is some way in which, compatibly with the provisions of the Crime and Courts Act 2013, District Judges, Circuit Judges and Recorders can be given powers more extensive than those currently available to them in these cases,' Sir Munby said in his judgment. 

 

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from