Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 22 February 2021)Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19...
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
View all articles

Pre-Nuptial Agreements aren’t just for the rich and famous

Feb 4, 2019, 07:22 AM
Pre-Nuptial Agreements aren’t just for the rich and famous
Slug :
Meta Title : Pre-Nuptial Agreements aren’t just for the rich and famous
Meta Keywords : Pre-Nuptial Agreements aren’t just for the rich and famous
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : Yes
Prioritise In Trending Articles : Yes
Date : Feb 4, 2019, 07:11 AM
Article ID :
Kate Bradbury, of Brodies, discusses why pre-nuptial agreements are not solely for those with a lot of money in the bank.

In 1993, Jeff Bezos and Mackenzie Tuttle were just like any newly married couple. Who knew that some 25 years later, Jeff would be Amazon’s CEO, making the pair the world’s richest couple?

It is impossible to predict the future. It is doubtful anyone could have known that in 2018, Bezos would become the world’s wealthiest person, with an estimated fortune of $137 billion (£107 billion). The State of Washington, where the couple and Amazon are based, is a ‘community property state’, meaning that any wealth accrued during the marriage is equally divided between the parties, unless there is a Pre-Nuptial Agreement. Given most of their wealth was amassed after the marriage, (Amazon was set up in 1995) there was perhaps little thought given to a Pre-Nuptial Agreement. But what if it were the other way around?

Under Scots law, matrimonial property is defined in the Family Law (Scotland) Act 1985 as “all the property belonging to the partners or either of them at the relevant date (date of separation) which was acquired by them jointly or individually, otherwise than by way of gift of succession from a third party:

  • Before the marriage for use by them as a family home or as furniture or plenishings for such home; or
  • During the marriage but before the relevant date”.

Therefore, if the parties were divorcing in Scotland, the valuable Amazon shares would be in the ‘matrimonial pot’ as the company was set up during the marriage. If however, Amazon had been set up in 1993 and the parties had exchanged vows in 1995, the shares in Amazon would not constitute “matrimonial property”, thereby reducing the ‘pot’ significantly. The parties have vowed to remain amicable and “cherished friends”, so will hopefully be able to reach a financial settlement which favours them both.

If you have that entrepreneurial spark and consider yourself the next Mark Zuckerberg or Denise Coates, and are in a relationship, the first step is to seek independent legal advice. Such advice can help to ensure certain assets are protected from claims for financial provision on divorce. A simple way of doing so would be to enter into a Pre-Nuptial Agreement. It is important to understand that such Agreements are not only for the rich and famous. Most importantly, the cost of such an Agreement is considerably less than an average divorce.

Categories :
  • Articles
  • News
Tags :
  • Divorce
  • pre-nup
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family Law (General)
Load more comments
Comment by from