Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Practical aspects to assessing competence in children
Rebecca Stevens, Partner, Royds Withy KingThis is an article regarding the practical aspects to assessing competence in children. The article explores a range of practicalities, such as meeting a...
Scrumping the crop of recent pension decisions
Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Conduct in financial remedies – when is it now a relevant consideration?
Rachel Gillman, 1 GC/Family LawThis article provides an overview of all aspects of financial misconduct following the recent decision of Mostyn J in OG v AG [2020] EWFC 52, wherein all aspects of...
The treatment of RSUs/Stock Options in light of XW v XH
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
View all articles
Authors

Practice Guidance: Standard financial and enforcement orders (addendum no 2)

Sep 29, 2018, 23:20 PM
Family Law, practice guidance, financial remeddies, standard financial and enforcement orders, Introductory Recital, Determining Event Clause
On 30 November 2017 I issued ‘Practice Guidance: Standard financial and enforcement orders’ [2018] Fam Law 89. On 22 January 2018 I issued ‘Practice Guidance: Standard financial and enforcement orders (addendum)’ [2018] Fam Law 216 to correct a minor error affecting only a very few forms. Since then I have received a handful of representations about some of the paragraphs in these orders. In the light of them I have decided to issue the following amendments.
Slug : practice-guidance-standard-financial-and-enforcement-orders-addendum-no-2
Meta Title : President’s Guidance: Standard financial and enforcement orders (addendum no 2)
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : Yes
Prioritise In Trending Articles : Yes
Date : May 15, 2018, 06:34 AM
Article ID : 117144

On 30 November 2017 I issued ‘Practice Guidance: Standard financial and enforcement orders’ [2018] Fam Law 89. On 22 January 2018 I issued ‘Practice Guidance: Standard financial and enforcement orders (addendum)’ [2018] Fam Law 216 to correct a minor error affecting only a very few forms.

Since then I have received a handful of representations about some of the paragraphs in these orders. In the light of them I have decided to issue the following amendments.

Introductory Recital

In the introductory recital in Order 2.1 (Financial Remedy Order) at paragraph 22(g) the following wording appears:

All other claims of any nature which one may have against the other as a result of their marriage/civil partnership howsoever arising either in England and Wales or in any other jurisdiction

Representations made have suggested that it should be made clear that the words “as a result of their marriage/civil partnership” and “howsoever arising” are alternatives (for example, in a case where one spouse is employed by the other and may have an employment-related claim, it should be made clear in the order whether such claim is intended to be compromised in addition to marriage/civil partnership based claims). I accept these representations and this clause should therefore be amended to the following:

All other claims of any nature which one may have against the other [as a result of [their  marriage] / [civil partnership]] / [howsoever arising] either in England and Wales or in any other jurisdiction


Determining Event Clause

A ‘determining event’ clause in the form below (or occasionally in very slightly different form):

the youngest surviving [of the] child[ren] of the family attaining the age of 18 years or ceasing [his] / [her] / [their] full-time [secondary] / [tertiary] education [to first degree level] [[including] / [excluding] a gap year], or ceasing to live permanently with the [applicant] / [respondent], whichever is the later

appears in the following orders:

  • Order 2.1 (Financial Remedy Order) in paragraphs 56(b)(i), 57(b)(i), 59(c)(iii) and 83(b)(iii)

  • Order 2.2 (Order under Children Act 1989, Schedule 1) in paragraphs 30(b)(i), 32(e)(ii), 53(b)(i), 54(b)(i), 55(b)(i), 56(b)(i), 58(d)(iii) and 80(a)

To avoid possible ambiguities arising from this wording, wherever the determining event clause appears in the Standard Orders, this clause should now be amended to the following:

[all the surviving children of the family] / [the surviving child of the family] attaining the age of 18 years or ceasing [his] / [her] / [their] full-time [secondary] / [tertiary] education [to first degree level] [[including] / [excluding] a gap year], whichever is the later, save that if prior to this [all the surviving children of the family] / [the surviving child of the family] [have][has] ceased to live permanently with the [applicant] / [respondent], the determining event shall arise upon such cessation

The zip file containing Orders 2.1 and 2.2 as amended by this update can be downloaded from www.judiciary.gov.uk.

15 May 2018

Categories :
  • Legislation & Guidance
  • News
  • Practice Guidance
Tags :
Judiciary
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Load more comments
Comment by from