Family Law

News
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
3 MAR 2021
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group...
3 MAR 2021
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
3 MAR 2021
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive...
3 MAR 2021
SCTS releases new simplified divorce and dissolution forms for Scotland
26 FEB 2021
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption...
26 FEB 2021
View all news
Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
View similar products
Court of Protection Practice 2021
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
View similar products
Family Law Awards 2020
Family Law Awards 2020
See the winners
View similar products
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
View similar products
Available in LexisNexis@Library
Spotlight
Latest articles
JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 22 February 2021)Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19...
Samantha Bangham
Article 5 MAR 2021
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
Samantha Bangham
Article 5 MAR 2021
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
Article 3 MAR 2021
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
Article 3 MAR 2021
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
Article 3 MAR 2021
View all articles
Latest articles
View all articles
Authors
Author
Lucy Loizou
Author
Kristianna Beta
Author
Louise Tickle
Author
Karen Barham
Author
Martin Kingerley QC
Author
Rhys Taylor
View all authors

Practice Direction: Attendance of Media Representatives at Hearings in Family Proceedings - Family Proceedings Court

Sep 29, 2018, 17:09 PM
Slug : practice-direction-attendance-of-media-representatives-at-hearings-in-family-proceedings-family-proceedings-court
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Apr 20, 2009, 04:22 AM
Article ID : 87125

This Practice Direction has been issued by President of the Family Division and supplements rule 16A of the Family Proceedings Courts (Children Act 1989) Rules 1991 and deals with the right of representatives of news gathering and reporting organisations to attend at hearings of relevant proceedings subject to the discretion of the court to exclude such representatives from the whole or part of any hearing on specified grounds.

This Practice Direction takes effect on 27 April 2009.

Categories :
  • Legislation & Guidance
  • Practice Guidance
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles

Leave a comment

Order by

Newest on top Oldest on top
Load more comments
Comment by from
Copyright © 2021 LexisNexis