Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

Practice Direction Amendments to PD9A, PD12B and PD27A

Sep 29, 2018, 22:05 PM
Family Law, Practice Direction amendments, court bundles, child arrangements programme, track of a case
The Ministry of Justice have published a Practice Direction Amendment which makes three minor changes to existing practice directions PD9A, PD12B and PD27A
Slug : practice-direction-amendments-to-pd9a-pd12b-and-pd27a
Meta Title : Practice Direction Amendments to PD9A, PD12B and PD27A
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : Yes
Prioritise In Trending Articles : Yes
Date : Jul 25, 2018, 03:32 AM
Article ID : 117294
The Ministry of Justice have published a Practice Direction Amendment which makes three minor changes to existing practice directions:

a. It limits the number of pages of certain core documents within court bundles; 
b. It amends the Child arrangements programme to strengthen the use of Form C1A when making decisions about allocation and case managements; and 
c. It amends the names of the track to ensure consistency amongst the practice direction and enables parties to ask the court to change the track of the case.
The provisions of Practice Direction 27A relate to the preparation of court bundles and specify what documents should be contained within a court bundle. It is designed to achieve consistency in family proceedings in the family court and Family Division of the High Court. It also directs that only those documents which are relevant to the hearing should be included in a bundle. The changes limit the number of pages within bundles submitted to the court for use in the hearing. The changes also limit the page numbers of core documents, specifically, witness statements to a maximum of 25 pages, expert reports to a maximum of 40 pages and care plans to a maximum of 10 pages. 

Practice Direction 12B outlines the procedure in relation to applications about arrangements for children made under s 8 of the Children Act 1989. These amendments now make more effective use of the Form C1A (which details allegations of harm) when identifying any safeguarding issues in the proceedings. Operational staff now make provision for serving copies of Form C1A on Cafcass when it has been submitted by either the applicant or the respondent. This amended process is reflected in the Practice Direction so parties are aware of how Form C1A will be used when decisions are made about allocation and case management. 

On 4 July 2018, amendments to Part 9 of the Family Procedure Rules with a supporting Practice Direction came into force. This further amendment to Practice Direction 9A clarifies that if the financial remedy application only seeks an order for a periodical payment, then the case will be allocated to the fast-track which is intended to be a faster and simpler process for those cases where the issues are not complex. The changes also enable an applicant in a financial remedy application, whose case has been allocated to the fast track, to make a request for the track to be changed, giving reasons for this request, within 7 days of the application being served on the respondent. 

The Practice Direction amending document can be found below.

Practice Direction amending document - July amendments to PD 9A, PD12B and PD27A.DOCX
Categories :
  • Legislation & Guidance
  • News
  • Practice Directions
Tags :
Ministry_of_Justice
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Load more comments
Comment by from