Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Re R (Children) (Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), King, Peter Jackson, Elisabeth Laing LJJ, 12 February 2021)Practice and Procedure – Disclosure of court documents – Sexual abuse findings –...
AG v VD [2021] EWFC 9
(Family Court, Cohen J, 04 February 2021) Financial Remedies – Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, Part III – Russian divorceThe wife was awarded just under £6m...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
SCTS releases new simplified divorce and dissolution forms for Scotland
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) has released new simplified divorce and dissolution forms of application. As a result of legislation repealing Council Regulation EC 2201/2003, the...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
View all articles
Authors

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: WCC v AB and SB [2013] COPLR 157

Sep 29, 2018, 21:03 PM
Slug : practice-and-procedure-wcc-v-ab-and-sb-2013-coplr-157
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Apr 9, 2013, 04:21 AM
Article ID : 102077

(Court of Protection, His Honour Judge Cardinal, 26 October 2012)

In proceedings concerning the welfare of a young man, his aunt applied to act as his litigation friend. The Official Solicitor had twice been asked to act on his behalf but no response had been received. At an interim hearing a representative from the Official Solicitor's office reported that they would not be able to consider the man's case for a further 10 weeks. The local authority expressed concerns about the appointment of the aunt that she would not be independent or objective.

The court appointed the aunt to act as the man's litigation friend and ordered reports from a consultant psychiatrist and an independent social worker. In appointing a litigation friend the court had to be satisfied that they could fairly and competently conduct proceedings on behalf of the person and had no interests which would be adverse to them. The local authority's concerns were not made out on the evidence. If, in the future further concerns arose, the court would entertain an application to remove her very quickly.

 

Categories :
  • Court of Protection
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from