Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
View all articles
Authors

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: WCC v AB and SB [2013] COPLR 157

Sep 29, 2018, 21:03 PM
Slug : practice-and-procedure-wcc-v-ab-and-sb-2013-coplr-157
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Apr 9, 2013, 04:21 AM
Article ID : 102077

(Court of Protection, His Honour Judge Cardinal, 26 October 2012)

In proceedings concerning the welfare of a young man, his aunt applied to act as his litigation friend. The Official Solicitor had twice been asked to act on his behalf but no response had been received. At an interim hearing a representative from the Official Solicitor's office reported that they would not be able to consider the man's case for a further 10 weeks. The local authority expressed concerns about the appointment of the aunt that she would not be independent or objective.

The court appointed the aunt to act as the man's litigation friend and ordered reports from a consultant psychiatrist and an independent social worker. In appointing a litigation friend the court had to be satisfied that they could fairly and competently conduct proceedings on behalf of the person and had no interests which would be adverse to them. The local authority's concerns were not made out on the evidence. If, in the future further concerns arose, the court would entertain an application to remove her very quickly.

 

Categories :
  • Court of Protection
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from