Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Scrumping the crop of recent pension decisions
Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Conduct in financial remedies – when is it now a relevant consideration?
Rachel Gillman, 1 GC/Family LawThis article provides an overview of all aspects of financial misconduct following the recent decision of Mostyn J in OG v AG [2020] EWFC 52, wherein all aspects of...
The treatment of RSUs/Stock Options in light of XW v XH
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
View all articles
Authors

PR v JES and Another (Appeal: Sexual Abuse, Fact Finding) [2019] EWHC 791 (Fam)

Apr 4, 2019, 13:02 PM
Public law children – Fact finding – Sexual abuse allegations – Whether the judge had conducted a proper analysis of the evidence – Consideration of weight to be given to young child’s disclosure
The appeal from findings of fact made in relation to sexual abuse allegations was allowed and the case remitted for rehearing.
Slug :
Meta Title : PR v JES and Another (Appeal: Sexual Abuse, Fact Finding) [2019] EWHC 791 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Public law children – Fact finding – Sexual abuse allegations – Whether the judge had conducted a proper analysis of the evidence – Consideration of weight to be given to young child’s disclosure
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Apr 3, 2019, 23:00 PM
Article ID :

(Family Division, Williams J, 29 March 2019)

Public law children – Fact finding – Sexual abuse allegations – Whether the judge had conducted a proper analysis of the evidence – Consideration of weight to be given to young child’s disclosure

The appeal from findings of fact made in relation to sexual abuse allegations was allowed and the case remitted for rehearing.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.


Neutral Citation Number: [2019] EWHC 791 (Fam)

Case No: 2018/0125

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 29/03/2019

Before :

MR JUSTICE WILLIAMS

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between :

PR
Applicant

- and -

JES
1st Respondent

- and –

TER
2nd Respondent

(Appeal: Sexual Abuse, Fact Finding)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Lucy Hendry (instructed by Laceys Solicitors) for the Applicant
Alev Giz (instructed by Philcox Gray) for the 1st Respondent
The 2nd Respondent did not appear and was not represented

Hearing dates: 14th - 15th March 2019

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Approved Judgment

I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic.

.............................

MR JUSTICE WILLIAMS

This judgment was delivered in public. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.

 

Judgment: PR v JES and another (Appeal: Sexual Abuse, Fact Finding) [2019] EWHC 791 (Fam)

 

Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Public Law Children
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from