Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
A seismic change in ethos and practice
Caroline Bowden, a member of the Private Family Law Early Resolution Working Group which first examined what changes were needed, looks at the effect of the revised rules on everyone working in family...
Debunking the myth about sensitivity in drug and alcohol testing
*** SPONSORED CONTENT***With all the news about deep fakes, authentication and transparency in the news at the moment, Cansford Laboratories Reporting Scientist Jayne Hazon has examined a recent...
New Family Presiding Judges Appointed
The Lady Chief Justice, with the concurrence of the Lord Chancellor, has announced the appointment of two Family Presiding Judges.Mr Justice MacDonald has been appointed for a period of four years,...
Victims given greater access to justice through legal aid reform
Innocent people who have suffered miscarriages of justice, personal harm or injury are among those who will benefit from upcoming changes to legal aid means testing coming into effect this...
Obligations and responsibilities – the mosquito in the bedroom
Stephen Wildblood KC, 3PB BarristersLuke Nelson, 3PB BarristersWhatever happened to ‘obligations and responsibilities’ in s 25(2) MCA 1973?  Why is it that all of the other words in...
View all articles
Authors

Post adoption contact and placement orders – when should we argue for the former and challenge the latter?

Sep 1, 2020, 08:11 AM
Title : Post adoption contact and placement orders – when should we argue for the former and challenge the latter?
Slug :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Aug 31, 2020, 23:00 PM
Article ID :

Emily Mitchell, 7BR Barristers Chambers
Kitty Geddes, 7BR Barristers Chambers

This article focuses on the possible methods of ensuring that the making of a Placement Order does not always spell complete severance between a child and their birth family; whether this is achieved via Post-Adoption contact or by mounting a further challenge for reunification prior to an Adoption Order being made. In particular, the article considers the impact of Section 51A of the Adoption and Children Act 2002 on the general approach being exercised by the courts regarding Post-Adoption Contact, and what appear to remain the fundamental considerations when evaluating the issue of whether future contact between the adopted child and the birth family should be sanctioned. The article further addresses the available avenues of challenging Placement Orders and Adoption Orders, with a particular focus on the type of cases where such challenges should be given consideration; the court’s approach to the issue of Leave and whether it should be granted; and the likely evidence that will be required to enable an application to be fully and properly determined.

 


 

The full article will be published in the September issue of Family Law

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of Family Law journal. Please quote: 100482.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from