Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
View all articles
Authors

PLACEMENT ORDER: Re F (Appeal From Placement Order) [2013] EWCA Civ 1277

Sep 29, 2018, 18:51 PM
Slug : placement-order-re-f-appeal-from-placement-order-2013-ewca-civ-1277
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Oct 28, 2013, 06:39 AM
Article ID : 103919

(Court of Appeal, Rimer, Black, Kitchin LJJ, 23 October 2013)

The 4-year-old child was reported to be very troubled and in need of intensive therapy. The psychologist did not refer to her as unadoptable but reported that she would need a programme of therapeutic parenting before adoption could be considered. Nevertheless at a final hearing final care and placement orders were granted. The father's first appeal of the placement order was refused.

On appeal to the Court of Appeal the appeal was allowed. It was clear from the psychological evidence that it was impossible to tell whether adoption would be appropriate for the child until she had undertaken some therapy. At which point it would depend on how she had progressed and also what adopters were available at the time. On the totality of the evidence it was not established that the child's welfare throughout her life required adoption. It was wrong for the court to have granted a placement order.

 

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from