Simon Wilkinson, Parklane PlowdenThe Covid-19 pandemic has infiltrated every aspect of our lives. Within the courts and tribunals service there has been a plethora of guidance since March 2020 which...
Mani Singh Basi, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingsLucy Logan Green, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingThis article considers the interplay between private and public law proceedings, focusing on the law relating...
The Ministry of Justice has launched a consultation on the proposed transfer from Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service to the Legal Aid Agency of the assessment of all civil legal aid bills of...
Pensions on divorce: a study on when and how they are taken into account
Sep 29, 2018, 19:24 PM
This article summarises the findings of a study of pensions on divorce in England and Wales, which included a survey of 369 divorce court files with a final financial remedy order, interviews with 32 family solicitors and 7 district judges and expert asse
Meta Title :Pensions on divorce: a study on when and how they are taken into account
Meta Keywords :family law, pensions, divorce,
Canonical URL :
Trending Article :
Prioritise In Trending Articles :
Mar 7, 2014, 04:15 AM
Article ID :104989
This is the first detailed study into pension sharing since its introduction in England and Wales. It was designed to provide an insight into the manner and extent to which pensions are included in final divorce financial remedy orders. The overall purpose was to investigate any procedural, legal, economic or social factors which might be affecting the use of the court's powers with regard to pensions on divorce. The study was led by Hilary Woodward of Cardiff Law School, Cardiff University and Mark Sefton, former Research Associate, Cardiff Law School. The study was funded by the Nuffield Foundation.
The below is a summary of Hilary Woodward's and Mark Sefton's exclusive article that will be published in the April issue of Family Law.
This article summarises the findings of a study of pensions on divorce in England and Wales, which included a survey of 369 divorce court files with a final financial remedy order, interviews with 32 family solicitors and 7 district judges and expert assessment of a sample of the survey data.
The study explored the reasons for the low incidence of pension orders on divorce; the circumstances in which pension orders are most likely (or unlikely) to be made; the alternatives adopted; the apparent economic rationality and fairness of pension orders and the approaches to pensions in general; the rationales and objectives behind the orders; the quality of financial disclosure and the circumstances in which judges intervene on pensions in consent order cases.
The article concludes that pension sharing is a positive addition to the range of financial remedies on divorce but tends to be the prerogative of a relatively privileged minority. The complexity of pension issues manifests itself in a lack of clarity on pensions in financial orders and supporting documentation, and masks a gender imbalance in outcomes likely to be exacerbated by the reductions in public funding.