Patel v Mirza [2016] UKSC 42
Sep 29, 2018, 18:34 PM
The issue was when involvement in illegality bars a claim. The Supreme Court unanimously dismisses Mr Mirza’s appeal. Mr Patel is entitled to restitution of the £620,000 which he paid to Mr Mirza.
Slug :
patel-v-mirza-2016-uksc-42
Meta Title :
Patel v Mirza [2016] UKSC 42
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article :
No
Prioritise In Trending Articles :
No
Date :
Aug 3, 2016, 04:50 AM
Article ID :
112873
(Supreme Court, Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr, Lord Clarke, Lord Wilson, Lord Sumption, Lord Toulson, Lord Hodge, 20 July 2016)
The issue was when involvement in illegality bars a claim. The Supreme Court unanimously dismisses Mr Mirza’s appeal. Mr Patel is entitled to restitution of the £620,000 which he paid to Mr Mirza.
Trinity Term
[2016] UKSC 42
On appeal from: [2014] EWCA Civ 1047
JUDGMENT
Patel (Respondent) v Mirza (Appellant)
before
Lord Neuberger, President
Lady Hale, Deputy President
Lord Mance
Lord Kerr
Lord Clarke
Lord Wilson
Lord Sumption
Lord Toulson
Lord Hodge
JUDGMENT GIVEN ON
20 July 2016
Heard on 16 and 17 February 2016
Categories :
- Judgments
- Practice and Procedure
Provider :
.jpg?sfvrsn=e5a4f948_1)
![Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)](https://www.familylaw.co.uk/images/article_provider/flr_cover.tmb-desktoplat.jpg?sfvrsn=66b9ac90_3)
6 MAY 2021
![Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)](https://www.familylaw.co.uk/images/article_provider/flr_cover.tmb-moblatest.jpg?sfvrsn=66b9ac90_3)
Leave a commentOrder by
Newest on top Oldest on top