Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
One in four family lawyers contemplates leaving the profession, Resolution reveals
A quarter of family justice professionals are on the verge of quitting the profession as the toll of lockdown on their mental health becomes clear, the family law group Resolution revealed today,...
Family Law Awards adds a Wellbeing Award - enter now
This past year has been different for everyone, but family law professionals working on the front line of family justice have faced a more challenging, stressful and demanding time than most. To...
Pension sharing orders: Finch v Baker
The Court of Appeal judgment in Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72 was released on 28 January 2021. The judgment provides some useful guidance on not being able to get what are essentially...
Eight things you need to know: Personal Injury damages in divorce cases
The “pre-acquired” or “non-matrimonial” argument is one which has taken up much commentary in family law circles over recent years.  However, the conundrum can be even...
Misogyny as a hate crime – what it means and why it’s needed
In recent weeks, the government announced that it will instruct all police forces across the UK to start recording crimes motivated by sex or gender on an experimental basis- effectively making...
View all articles
Authors

Parents' Rights v Children's Needs in Private Cases

Sep 29, 2018, 17:11 PM
Slug : parents-rights-v-children-s-needs-in-private-cases
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 8, 2007, 06:17 AM
Article ID : 87263

Steve Adams, Acting Head of Service, CAFCASS London Region. In this article the case is put that the assumption of contact taking place post separation, in cases where the pursuance of contact creates long-term court-centred conflict, needs to be shifted in the light of research evidence. In its practice the courts have become aligned to the position of powerful parental lobbies. Research and children's needs have in effect been marginalised, long-term litigation and an increase in r 9.5s has resulted, when what is needed is appropriate services to families earlier in the process and a recognition that constructive contact in many cases is an unattainable goal. The author goes on to consider what services CAFCASS should be providing to reduce conflict and analyses where resources are currently being directed and what might be more effective ways of managing the issue as it relates to the impact on the children and families involved and their best interests. For the full discussion see March [2007] Fam Law.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from