Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
Obligations and responsibilities – the mosquito in the bedroom
Stephen Wildblood KC, 3PB BarristersLuke Nelson, 3PB BarristersWhatever happened to ‘obligations and responsibilities’ in s 25(2) MCA 1973?  Why is it that all of the other words in...
A rare order for a child in utero
Mary Welstead, CAP Fellow Harvard Law School; Visiting Professor in Family law University of BuckinghamIn 2023, Kettering NHS Trust applied for an anticipatory declaration for a child...
Stranded spouses: an overview
Mani Singh Basi, Barrister, 4PB, author of A Practical Guide to Stranded Spouses in Family Law ProceedingsThis article provides an overview of the issues that often arise in cases...
Now is the time to reassess presumption f parental involvement in cases involving domestic abuse
Lea Levine, Paralegal at Stewarts and former independent domestic violence advisorIn this article, paralegal and former independent domestic violence advisor (“IDVA”) Lea Levine...
Hadkinson orders – applicability in financial remedy proceedings
Hassan Sarwar, Cornwall Street BarristersHassan Sarwar considers the development and usage of Hadkinson Orders in financial remedy proceedings.  The article provides a helpful overview of a...
View all articles
Authors

Ofsted apologises for serious and deeply regrettable error" in Shoesmith case"

Sep 29, 2018, 17:46 PM
Title : Ofsted apologises for serious and deeply regrettable error" in Shoesmith case"
Slug : ofsted-apologises-for-serious-and-deeply-regrettable-error-in-shoesmith-case
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Oct 11, 2009, 11:33 AM
Article ID : 90519

Ofsted has admitted making a "serious and deeply regrettable error" in failing to disclose potential evidence in the High Court case of Sharon Shoesmith, the former Director of Children's Services for Haringey Council.

Ms Shoesmith is seeking a judicial review of the decision to dismiss her last year in the wake of the Baby Peter tragedy.

Last month the Guardian newspaper revealed documents showing that Ofsted downgraded an initial Annual Performance Assessment report into Haringey children's services from "good" to "inadequate" following the media coverage of the death of Baby Peter.

High Court Judge Mr Justice Foskett gave Ofsted 14 days to ensure no other documents in the case were withheld.

The latest disclosed documents include an inspector's notebook, various emails and drafts of the emerging report of the Haringey inspection in November 2008.

An Ofsted spokesperson said: "We very much regret that this has happened. We have apologised unreservedly to the court and other parties.

"Unfortunately mistakes sometimes happen and whilst this is a serious one and deeply regrettable, we have nothing to hide.

"Whilst we are very sorry for the late disclosure, we do not believe that the documentation we have disclosed today has any material bearing on the central issues in the case. We remain confident in the quality of the inspection and the findings in the report."

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from