Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
No fault divorce - the end of the blame game
The Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020, which passed into law on 25 June 2020, will introduce "no fault" divorce in England and Wales for the first time. This article looks at what it...
New Cafcass guidance on working with children during COVID-19
The Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass) has published guidance on working with children during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The guidance sets out arrangements for...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
Online event: An update on recovery in the civil, family courts & tribunals
HM Courts and Tribunals Service has announced that it is holding an online event to discuss its recovery plan for the civil, family courts and tribunals, which was published on 9 November 2020...
HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirms 2020 Christmas and new year closure dates
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has confirmed the dates over the Christmas and new year period in which Crown Courts, magistrates’ courts,...
View all articles
Authors

Ofsted accused of changing Haringey report after Baby P

Sep 29, 2018, 17:43 PM
Slug : ofsted-accused-of-changing-haringey-report-after-baby-p
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Oct 12, 2009, 08:56 AM
Article ID : 90133

The Guardian reports to have seen documents showing that Ofsted downgraded an initial Annual Performance Assessment (APA) report into Haringey children's services from "good" to "inadequate" following the media coverage of the death of Baby Peter.

Sharon Shoesmith, the former Director of Children's Services for Haringey Council, was in the High Court last week seeking a judicial review of the decision to dismiss her after the finding of an emergency Joint Area Review were published on 1 December last year in the wake of the Baby Peter tragedy.

The Guardian reports that a whistleblower has shown them an initial draft of the 2008 APA into Haringey children's services which reveals that Ofsted downgraded the council's performance in key areas, including child protection, from "good" to "inadequate" following Ms Shoesmith's dismissal.

In a statement to Newswatch Ofsted denied the allegations. "The APA was a system that looked at both performance data and inspection evidence for local authorities. It was therefore entirely appropriate for the 2008 APA assessment for Haringey to take into account the specially commissioned Joint Area Review", an Ofsted spokesperson said.

"When it became apparent to Ofsted that the credibility of some of the evidence used to come to the draft APA for Haringey was in doubt, the draft APA was formally suspended at the internal APA consistency panel on 13 November 2008.

"Following the completion of the specially commissioned Joint Area Review, new inspectors were asked to start the APA again. Ofsted completely refutes the allegation that it manipulated any results. No pressure was put on these inspectors to downgrade the APA rating", the spokesperson added.

The allegations that Ofsted changed the report could have ramifications for Ms Shoesmith's judicial review case. Today her lawyers wrote to the Treasury Solicitor requesting disclosure of the draft report.

The chairman of the children's select committee, Barry Sheerman, has called for an inquiry. In a letter to Ofsted's chief inspector, Christine Gilbert, Mr Sheerman says: "The information provided to me alleges that at a very senior level the inspection team were asked to re-evaluate their assessment using the same statistics and information and with no further visits. The report was rewritten with a very different set of scores and commentary.

"As these are such serious allegations and in view of current developments around the Haringey case I would welcome an immediate response."
"

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from