Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
View all articles
Authors

CARE PROCEEDINGS: O-M, GM (and KM) v The Local Authority, LO and EM [2009] EWCA Civ 1405

Sep 29, 2018, 17:15 PM
Slug : o-m-gm-and-km-v-the-local-authority-lo-and-em-2009-ewca-civ-1405
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Dec 21, 2009, 04:23 AM
Article ID : 87699

(Court of Appeal; Thorpe, Wall and Patten LJJ; 21 December 2009)

Clinical involvement did not of itself affect a doctor's capacity to act as an expert witness. A situation in which experts in rare bone disorders were both treating a child and acting as expert witnesses was different to the situation in Re B (Sexual Abuse: Expert's Report) [2000] 1 FLR 871, which had involved a clinician treating a child for alleged sexual abuse giving her opinion as an expert as to whether sexual abuse has occurred. In this case there had been real consensus among the experts. Medical evidence was to be looked at in terms of the court proceedings: there was a clear distinction to be drawn between a medical decision as to what was clinically required for a child's treatment and a forensic decision about what was necessary to ensure a proper determination of an issue. When a parent sought permission to instruct another expert witness, the burden was on the parents to show that the additional expert would contribute something to the case.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from