Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
View all articles
Authors

O’Dwyer v O’Dwyer [2019] EWHC 1838 (Fam)

Jul 17, 2019, 13:53 PM
Financial remedies – Divorce – Periodical payments order – Husband appealed.
The Family Division found that the judge had been wrong to identify the income stream of the business as matrimonial property.
Slug :
Meta Title : O’Dwyer v O’Dwyer [2019] EWHC 1838 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Financial remedies – Divorce – Periodical payments order – Husband appealed.
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jul 16, 2019, 23:00 PM
Article ID :

(Family Division, Francis J, 12 July 2019)

Financial remedies – Divorce – Periodical payments order – Husband appealed.

The Family Division found that the judge had been wrong to identify the income stream of the business as matrimonial property.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.


Neutral Citation Number: [2019] EWHC 1838 (Fam)

Case No: 2018/0078

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 12/07/2019

Before :

MR JUSTICE FRANCIS

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between :

John Thomas O’Dwyer
Applicant

- and -

Cindy Lea O’Dwyer
Respondent

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Valentine Le Grice QC (instructed by Fletcher Day Solicitors) for the Applicant
Nicholas Wilkinson (instructed by Seymours + Solicitors) for the Respondent

Hearing dates: 19th December 2018

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Approved Judgment

I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic.

.............................

MR JUSTICE FRANCIS

This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.

 

Judgment: O'Dwyer v O'Dwyer [2019] EWHC 1838 (Fam)

 

 

Categories :
  • Financial Remedies
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from