Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
View all articles
Authors

Not for sharing: passive growth, post-separation accrual, and post-separation earning capacity

Jan 10, 2020, 10:16 AM
Now that the dust has settled after Waggott v Waggott [2018] EWCA Civ 727, [2018] 2 FLR 406 this article reviews the recent series of reported cases dealing with the identification of non-matrimonial assets and the limits to the sharing principle.
Slug :
Meta Title : Not for sharing: passive growth, post-separation accrual, and post-separation earning capacity
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 10, 2020, 00:00 AM
Article ID :

Kate Armstrong, Dere Street Barristers

Now that the dust has settled after Waggott v Waggott [2018] EWCA Civ 727, [2018] 2 FLR 406 this article reviews the recent series of reported cases dealing with the identification of non-matrimonial assets and the limits to the sharing principle. The article considers the application of the principles to three interrelated themes raised in the recent case law:

(1)     Post-separation income (Waggott (above); O’Dwyer v O’Dwyer [2019] EWHC 1838 (Fam), [2019] 2 FLR 1020)
(2)     Passive growth (IX v IY (Financial Remedies: Unmatched Contributions) [2018] EWHC 3053 (Fam), [2019] 2 FLR 449)
(3)     Post-separation accruals (C v C (Post-Separation Accrual) [2018] EWHC 3186 (Fam), [2019] 1 FLR 939)

Two points emerge: First, a willingness to identify non-matrimonial property and to protect it from the sharing principle, and second a flexibility as to whether a broad brush or a more arithmetical approach is appropriate in identifying what of the available assets should be shared and if so, how.


The full article will be published in the January issue of Family Law

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of Family Law journal. Please quote: 100482.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from